|
|
|
题名
|
作者
|
年代
|
出处
|
被引量
|
| 1 | 单孔腹腔镜手术的技术瓶颈分析显示文摘 | 徐大华 | 2010 | 中国微创外科杂志2010，10，1： | 69 |
| 2 | Preoperative, intraoperative and postoperative risk factors for anastomotic leakage after laparoscopic low anterior resection with double stapling technique anastomosis显示文摘Anastomotic leakage(AL) is one of the most devastating complications after rectal cancer surgery. The double stapling technique has greatly facilitated intestinal reconstruction especially for anastomosis after low anterior resection(LAR). Risk factor analyses for AL after open LAR have been widely reported. However, a few studies have analyzed the risk factors for AL after laparoscopic LAR. Laparoscopic rectal surgery provides an excellent operative field in a narrow pelvic space, and enables total mesorectal excision surgery and preservation of the autonomic nervous system with greater precision. However, rectal transection using a laparoscopic linear stapler is relatively difficult compared with open surgery because of the width and limited performance of the linear stapler. Moreover, laparoscopic LAR exhibits a different postoperative course compared with open LAR, which suggests that the risk factors for AL after laparoscopic LAR may also differ from those after open LAR. In this review, we will discuss the risk factors for AL after laparoscopic LAR. | Kenji Kawada Yoshiharu Sakai | 2016 | World Journal of Gastroenterology2016，22，25： | 53 |
| 3 | Predictive factors for anastomotic leakage after laparoscopic colorectal surgery显示文摘Every colorectal surgeon during his or her career is faced with anastomotic leakage(AL); one of the most dreaded complications following any type of gastrointestinal anastomosis due to increased risk of morbidity, mortality, overall impact on functional and oncologic outcome and drainage on hospital resources. In order to understand and give an overview of the AL risk factors in laparoscopic colorectal surgery, we carried out a careful review of the existing literature on this topic and found several different definitions of AL which leads us to believe that the lack of a consensual, standard definition can partly explain the considerable variations in reported rates of AL in clinical studies. Colorectal leak rates have been found to vary depending on the anatomic location of the anastomosis with reported incidence rates ranging from 0 to 20%, while the laparoscopic approach to colorectal resections has not yet been associated with a significant reduction in AL incidence. As well, numerous risk factors, though identified, lack unanimous recognition amongst researchers. For example, the majority of papers describe the risk factors for left-sided anastomosis, the principal risk being male sex and lower anastomosis, while little data exists defining AL risk factors in a right colectomy. Also, gut microbioma is gaining an emerging role as potential risk factor for leakage. | Antonio Sciuto Giovanni Merola Giovanni D De Palma Maurizio Sodo Felice Pirozzi Umberto M Bracale Umberto Bracale | 2018 | World Journal of Gastroenterology2018，24，21： | 48 |
| 4 | Complete laparoscopic resection of the rectum using natural orifice specimen extraction显示文摘AIM: To investigate how complete laparoscopic anterior resection with natural orifice specimen extraction(NOSE), as a novel minimally invasive surgery, compares to conventional laparoscopic surgery.METHODS: Twenty patients who underwent complete laparoscopic anterior resection with NOSE and 50 patients who underwent laparoscopic assisted anterior resection by the conventional method between 2011 and 2012 were studied. Selection for complete laparoscopic anterior resection with NOSE was decided on the basis of tumor size, localization of the tumor, and body mass index. Outcomes related to surgery, including operation time, postoperative wound pain, hospital stay after surgery, the number of totally dissected lymph nodes, postoperative complications(suture failure and wound infection), and anal function, were reviewed retrospectively. Anal function was assessed at 3 and 6 mo after surgery using the Wexner fecal incontinence scoring system.RESULTS: Complete laparoscopic resection with NOSE was performed to completion in all 20 patients. There was no patient emergency that required conversion to conventional laparoscopic surgery or open surgery. The comparison between complete laparoscopic resection with NOSE and conventional laparoscopic surgery showed no significant differences in the maximal diameter of the tumor, number of totally dissected lymph nodes, bleeding volume, mean operation time, time to start of oral ingestion, postoperative hospital stay, and postoperative complications. On the other hand, with regard to pain after epidural anesthesia, the total usage of analgesia in this novel surgical technique was 1.85 ± 1.8 times, whereas it was 5.89 ± 2.86 in conventional laparoscopic surgery(P < 0.001). The postoperative pain period was 1.9 ± 1.9 d in this novel surgical technique, whereas it was 3.43 ± 1.41 d in conventional laparoscopic surgery(P < 0.004). In complete laparoscopic surgery with NOSE, the mean postoperative follow-up period was 20 mo(range: 12-30 mo). Neither local recurrence nor remote metastasis was observed during the follow-up period.CONCLUSION: Complete laparoscopic anterior resection using NOSE does not require any incision and has excellent cosmetic properties, with mitigated postoperative pain. | Masayuki Hisada Kenji Katsumata Tetsuo Ishizaki Masanobu Enomoto Takaaki Matsudo Kazuhiko Kasuya Akihiko Tsuchida | 2014 | World Journal of Gastroenterology2014，20，44： | 45 |
| 5 | Minimally invasive treatment of cholecysto-choledocal lithiasis:The point of view of the surgical endoscopist显示文摘The rate of choledocholithiasis in patients with symptomatic cholelithiasis is estimated to be approximately 10%-33%,depending on the patient's age.Development of Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography and Laparoscopic Surgery and improvement of diagnostic procedures have influenced new approaches to the management of common bile duct stones in association with gallstones.At present available minimally-invasive treatments of cholecysto-choledocal lithiasis include:single-stage laparoscopic treatment,perioperative endoscopic treatment and endoscopic treatment alone.Published data evidence that,associated endoscopic-laparoscopic approach necessitates increased number of procedures per patient while single-stage laparoscopic treatment is associated with a shorter hospital stay.However,current data does not suggest clear superiority of any one approach with regard to success,mortality,morbidity and cost-effectiveness.Considering the variety of therapeutic options available for management,a critical appraisal and decision-making is required.endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography/EST should be adopted on a selective basis,i.e.,in patients with acute obstructive suppurative cholangitis,severe biliary pancreatitis,ampullary stone impaction or severe comorbidity.In a setting where all facilities are available,decision in the selection of the therapeutic option depends on the patients,the number and size of choledocholithiasis stones,the anatomy of the cystic duct and common bile duct,the surgical history of patients and local expertise. | Giovanni D De Palma | 2013 | World Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery2013，5，6： | 36 |
| 6 | 单孔腹腔镜手术进展与未来显示文摘 | 姜海军 宫轲 | 2010 | 中国微创外科杂志2010，10，1： | 35 |
| 7 | Enhanced recovery after surgery with laparoscopic radical gastrectomy for stomach carcinomas显示文摘AIM: To study the efficacy of the enhanced recovery after surgery(ERAS) program in laparoscopic radical gastrectomy for stomach carcinomas.METHODS: From June 2010 to December 2012, 61 gastric cancer patients who underwent laparoscopicassisted radical gastrectomy with D2 lymphadenectomy at First Hospital of Jilin University were enrolled in this randomized controlled trial.(Clinical Trials.gov, registration ID: NCT01955096). The subjects were divided into the ERAS program group and the conventional control group. The clinical characteristics, recovery variables, and complications of patients were analyzed.RESULTS: The time to first ambulation, oral food intake, and time to defecation were significantly shorter in the ERAS group(n = 30), compared to the conventional group(n = 31; P = 0.04, 0.003, and 0.01, respectively). The postoperative hospital stay was less in the ERAS group(6.8 ± 1.1 d) compared to the conventional group(7.7 ± 1.1 d)(P = 0.002). There was no significant difference in postoperative complications between the ERAS(1/30) and conventional care groups(2/31)(P = 1.00). There were no readmissions or mortality during the 30-d follow-up period.CONCLUSION: The ERAS program is associated with a shorter hospital stay in gastric cancer patients undergoing laparoscopic radical gastrectomy. The ERAS protocol is useful in the treatment of gastric cancer. | Ikram Abdikarim Xue-Yuan Cao Shou-Zhen Li Yin-Quan Zhao Yerlan Taupyk Quan Wang | 2015 | World Journal of Gastroenterology2015，21，47： | 39 |
| 8 | Role of laparoscopic common bile duct exploration in the management of choledocholithiasis显示文摘Surgical fraternity has not yet arrived at any consensus for adequate treatment of choledocholithiasis. Sequential treatment in the form of pre-operative endoscopic retrograde cholangio-pancreatography followed by laparoscopic cholecystectomy(LC) is considered as optimal treatment till date. With refinements in technique and expertise in field of minimal access surgery, many centres in the world have started offering one stage management of choledocholithiasis by LC with laparoscopic common bile duct exploration(LCBDE). Various modalities have been tried for entering into concurrent common bile duct(CBD) [transcystic(TC) vs transcholedochal(TD)], for confirming stone clearance(intraoperative cholangiogram vs choledochoscopy), and for closure of choledochotomy(T-tube vs biliary stent vs primary closure) during LCBDE. Both TC and TD approaches are safe and effective. TD stone extraction is involved with an increased risk of bile leaks and requires more expertise in intra-corporeal suturing and choledochoscopy. Choice depends on number of stones, size of stone, diameter of cystic duct and CBD. This review article was undertaken to evaluate the role of LCBDE for the management of choledocholithiasis. | Nikhil Gupta | 2016 | World Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery2016，8，5： | 40 |
| 9 | Current state of laparoscopic parastomal hernia repair:A meta-analysis显示文摘AIM:To evaluate the efficacy and safety of the laparoscopic approaches for parastomal hernia repair reported in the literature.METHODS:A systematic review of PubMed and MEDLINE databases was conducted using various combination of the following keywords:stoma repair,laparoscopic,parastomal,and hernia.Case reports,studies with less than 5 patients,and articles not written in English were excluded.Eligible studies were further scrutinized with the 2011 levels of evidence from the Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine.Two authors reviewed and analyzed each study.If there was any discrepancy between scores,the study in question was referred to another author.A meta-analysis was performed using both random and fixed-effect models.Publication bias was evaluated using Begg's funnel plot and Egger's regression test.The primary outcome analyzed was recurrence of parastomal hernia.Secondary outcomes were mesh infection,surgical site infection,obstruction requiring reoperation,death,and other complications.Studies were grouped by operative technique where indicated.Except for recurrence,most postoperative morbidities were reported for the overall cohort and not by approach so they were analyzed across approach.RESULTS:Fifteen articles with a total of 469 patients were deemed eligible for review.Most postoperative morbidities were reported for the overall cohort,and not by approach.The overall postoperative morbidity rate was 1.8%(95%CI:0.8-3.2),and there was no difference between techniques.The most common postoperative complication was surgical site infection,which was seen in 3.8%(95%CI:2.3-5.7).Infected mesh was observed in 1.7%(95%CI:0.7-3.1),and obstruction requiring reoperation also occurred in 1.7%(95%CI:0.7-3.0).Other complications such as ileus,pneumonia,or urinary tract infection were noted in16.6%(95%CI:11.9-22.1).Eighty-one recurrences were reported overall for a recurrence rate of 17.4%(95%CI:9.5-26.9).The recurrence rate was 10.2%(95%CI:3.9-19.0) for the modified laparoscopic Sugarbaker approach,whereas the recurrence rate was27.9%(95%CI:12.3-46.9) for the keyhole approach.There were no intraoperative mortalities reported and six mortalities during the postoperative course.CONCLUSION:Laparoscopic intraperitoneal mesh repair is safe and effective for treating parastomal hernia.A modified Sugarbaker approach appears to provide the best outcomes. | Francis J DeAsis Brittany Lapin Matthew E Gitelis Michael B Ujiki | 2015 | World Journal of Gastroenterology2015，21，28： | 34 |
| 10 | Laparoscopic and robot-assisted laparoscopic digestivesurgery:Present and future directions显示文摘Laparoscopic surgery is applied today worldwide to most digestive procedures. In some of them, such as cholecystectomy, Nissen's fundoplication or obesity surgery, laparoscopy has become the standard in practice. In others, such as colon or gastric resection, the laparoscopic approach is frequently used and its usefulness is unquestionable. More complex procedures, such as esophageal, liver or pancreatic resections are, however, more infrequently performed, due to the high grade of skill necessary. As a result, there is less clinical evidence to support its implementation. In the recent years, robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery has been increasingly applied, again with little evidence for comparison with the conventional laparoscopic approach. This review will focus on the complex digestive procedures as well as those whose use in standard practice could be more controversial. Also novel robot-assisted procedures will be updated. | Juan C Rodríguez-Sanjuán Marcos Gómez-Ruiz Soledad Trugeda-Carrera Carlos Manuel-Palazuelos Antonio López-Useros Manuel Gómez-Fleitas | 2016 | World Journal of Gastroenterology2016，22，6： | 27 |
| 11 | Microwave ablation of hepatocellular carcinoma显示文摘Although surgical resection is still the optimal treatment option for early-stage hepatocellular carcinoma(HCC) in patients with well compensated cirrhosis,thermal ablation techniques provide a valid nonsurgical treatment alternative,thanks to their minimal invasiveness,excellent tolerability and safety profile,proven efficacy in local disease control,virtually unlimited repeatability and cost-effectiveness.Different energy sources are currently employed in clinics as physical agents for percutaneous or intra-surgical thermal ablation of HCC nodules.Among them,radiofrequency(RF) currents are the most used,while microwave ablations(MWA) are becoming increasingly popular.Starting from the 90s',RF ablation(RFA) rapidly became the standard of care in ablation,especially in the treatment of small HCC nodules;however,RFA exhibits substantial performance limitations in the treatment of large lesions and/or tumors located near major heat sinks.MWA,first introduced in the Far Eastern clinical practice in the 80s',showing promising results but also severe limitations in the controllability of the emitted field and in the high amount of power employed for the ablation of large tumors,resulting in a poor coagulative performance and a relatively high complication rate,nowadays shows better results both in terms of treatment controllability and of overall coagulative performance,thanks to the improvement of technology.In this review we provide an extensive and detailed overview of the key physical and technical aspects of MWA and of the currently available systems,and we want to discuss the most relevant published data on MWA treatments of HCC nodules in regard to clinical results and to the type and rate of complications,both in absolute terms and in comparison with RFA. | Guido Poggi Nevio Tosoratti Benedetta Montagna Chiara Picchi | 2015 | World Journal of Hepatology2015，7，25： | 28 |
| 12 | Fast-track rehabilitation vs conventional care in laparoscopic colorectal resection for colorectal malignancy: A meta-analysis显示文摘AIM:To evaluate the fast-track rehabilitation protocol and laparoscopic surgery(LFT)vs conventional care strategies and laparoscopic surgery(LCC).METHODS:Studies and relevant literature comparing the effects of LFT and LCC for colorectal malignancy were identified in MEDLINE,the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials and EMBASE.The complications and re-admission after approximately 1 mo were assessed.RESULTS:Six recent randomized controlled trials(RCTs)were included in this meta-analysis,which related to 655 enrolled patients.These studies demonstrated that compared with LCC,LFT has fewer complications and a similar incidence of re-admission after approximately 1 mo.LFT had a pooled RR of 0.60(95%CI:0.46-0.79,P<0.001)compared with a pooled RR of 0.69(95%CI:0.34-1.40,P>0.5)for LCC.CONCLUSION:LFT for colorectal malignancy is safe and efficacious.Larger prospective RCTs should be conducted to further compare the efficacy and safety of this approach. | Ping Li Fang Fang Jia-Xun Cai Dong Tang Qing-Guo Li Dao-Rong Wang | 2013 | World Journal of Gastroenterology2013，19，47： | 26 |
| 13 | 无气腹腹腔镜手术的临床应用显示文摘 | 刘海防 刘彦 | 2007 | 中国实用妇科与产科杂志2007，23，8： | 26 |
| 14 | Laparoscopic liver resections for hepatocellular carcinoma:Current role and limitations显示文摘Liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma(HCC)is currently known to be a safer procedure than it was before because of technical advances and improvement in postoperative patient management and remains the first-line treatment for HCC in compensated cirrhosis.The aim of this review is to assess current indications,advantages and limits of laparoscopic surgery for HCC resections.We also discussed the possible evolution of this surgical approach in parallel with new technologies. | Martin Gaillard Hadrien Tranchart Ibrahim Dagher | 2014 | World Journal of Gastroenterology2014，20，17： | 25 |
| 15 | Comparision of modified and conventional delta-shaped gastroduodenostomy in totally laparoscopic surgery显示文摘AIM:To evaluate the safety and feasibility of a modified delta-shaped gastroduodenostomy(DSG)in totally laparoscopic distal gastrectomy(TLDG).METHODS:We performed a case-control study enrolling 63 patients with distal gastric cancer(GC)undergoing TLDG with a DSG from January 2013 to June 2013.Twenty-two patients underwent a conventional DSG(Con-Group),whereas the other 41 patients underwent a modified version of the DSG(Mod-Group).The modified procedure required only the instruments of the surgeon and assistant to complete the involution of the common stab incision and to completely resect the duodenal cutting edge,resulting in an anastomosis with an inverted T-shaped appearance.The clinicopathological characteristics,surgical outcomes,anastomosis time and complications of the two groups were retrospectively analyzed using a prospectively maintained comprehensive database.RESULTS:DSG procedures were successfully completed in all of the patients with histologically complete(R0)resections,and none of these patients required conversion to open surgery.The clinicopathological characteristics of the two groups were similar.There were no significant differences between the groups in the operative time,intraoperative blood loss,extension of the lymph node(LN)dissection and number of dissected LNs(150.8±21.6 min vs 143.4±23.4 min,P=0.225for the operative time;26.8±11.3 min vs 30.6±14.8mL,P=0.157 for the intraoperative blood loss;4/18 vs3/38,P=0.375 for the extension of the LN dissection;and 43.9±13.4 vs 39.5±11.5 per case,P=0.151 for the number of dissected LNs).The anastomosis time,however,was significantly shorter in the Mod-Group than in the Con-Group(13.9±2.8 min vs 23.9±5.6min,P=0.000).The postoperative outcomes,including the times to out-of-bed activities,first flatus,resumption of soft diet and postoperative hospital stay,as well as the anastomosis size,did not differ significantly(1.9±0.6 d vs 2.3±1.5 d,P=0.228 for the time to outof-bed activities;3.2±0.9 d vs 3.5±1.3 d,P=0.295for the first flatus time;7.5±0.8 d vs 8.1±4.3 d,P=0.489 for the resumption of a soft diet time;14.3±10.6 d vs 11.5±4.9 d,P=0.148 for the postoperative hospital stay;and 30.5±3.6 mm vs 30.1±4.0 mm,P=0.730 for the anastomosis size).One patient with minor anastomotic leakage in the Con-Group was managed conservatively;no other patients experienced any complications around the anastomosis.The operative complication rates were similar in the Con-and ModGroups(9.1%vs 7.3%,P=1.000).CONCLUSION:The modified DSG,an alternative reconstruction in TLDG for GC,is technically safe and feasible,with a simpler process that reduces the anastomosis time. | Chang-Ming Huang Mi Lin Jian-Xian Lin Chao-Hui Zheng Ping Li Jian-Wei Xie Jia-Bin Wang Jun Lu | 2014 | World Journal of Gastroenterology2014，20，30： | 26 |
| 16 | Controversy of hand-assisted laparoscopic colorectal surgery显示文摘Laparoscopically assisted colorectal procedures are time-consuming and technically demanding and hence have a long steep learning curve. In the technical demand, surgeons need to handle a long mobile organ, the colon, and have to operate on multiple abdominal quadrants, most of the time with the need to secure multiple mesenteric vessels. Therefore, a new surgical innovation called hand-assisted laparoscopic surgery (HALS) was introduced in the mid 1990s as a useful alternative to totally laparoscopic procedures. This hybrid operation allows the surgeon to introduce the non-dominant hand into the abdominal cavity through a special hand port while maintaining the pneumoperitoneum. A hand in the abdomen can restore the tactile sensation which is usually lacking in laparoscopic procedures. It also improves the eye-to-hand coordination, allows the hand to be used for blunt dissection or retraction and also permits rapid control of unexpected bleeding. All of those factors can contribute tremendously to reducing the operative time. Moreover, this procedure is also considered as a hybrid procedure that combines the advantages of both minimally invasive and conventional open surgery. Nevertheless, the exact role of HALS in colorectal surgery has not been well defined during the advanced totally laparoscopic procedures. This article reviews the current status of hand-assisted laparoscopic colorectal surgery as a minimally invasive procedure in the era of laparoscopic surgery. | Abdul-Wahed Nasir Meshikhes | 2010 | World Journal of Gastroenterology2010，16，45： | 24 |
| 17 | Single-incision vs three-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy:Prospective randomized study显示文摘AIM:To compare the clinical outcome of single-inci-sion laparoscopic cholecystectomy(SILC)with threeport laparoscopic cholecystectomy(TPLC). METHODS:Between 2009 and 2011,one hundred and two patients with symptomatic benign gallbladder diseases were randomized to SILC(n=49)or TPLC (n=53).The primary end point was post operative pain score(at 6 h and 7 d).Secondary end points were blood loss,operation duration,overall complications,postoperative analgesic requirements,length of hospital stay,cosmetic result and total cost.Surgical techniques were standardized and all operations were performed by one experienced surgeon,who had performed more than 500 laparoscopic cholecystectomies. RESULTS:One patient in the SILC group required conversion to two-port LC.There were no open conversions or major complications in either treatment groups.There were no differences in terms of esti-mated blood loss(mean±SD,14±6.0 mL vs 15±4.0 mL),operation duration(mean±SD,41.8±17.0 min vs 38.5±22.0 min),port-site complications(contusion at incision:5 cases vs 4 cases and hematoma at inci- sion:2 cases vs 1 case),total cost(mean±SD,12 075 ±1047 RMB vs 11 982±1153 RMB)and hospital stay (mean±SD,1.0±0.5 d vs 1.0±0.2 d),respectively. TPLC had a significantly worse visual analogue pain score at 8 h after surgery(mean±SD,3.5±1.6 vs 2.0 ±1.5),however,the scores were similar on day 7(mean ±SD,2.5±1.4 vs 2.0±1.3).Cosmetic satisfaction, as determined by a survey at 2 mo follow-up favored SILC(mean±SD,8±0.4 vs 6±0.2). CONCLUSION:SILC is a safe and feasible approach in selected patients.The main advantages are a better cosmetic result and less pain. | Ming-Xin Pan Ze-Sheng Jiang Yuan Cheng Xiao-Ping Xu Zhi Zhang Jia-Sheng Qin Guo-Lin He Ting-Cheng Xu Chen-Jie Zhou Hai-Yan Liu Yi Gao | 2013 | World Journal of Gastroenterology2013，19，3： | 24 |
| 18 | 腹腔镜辅助阴式子宫切除术手术适应证及并发症的防治进展显示文摘腹腔镜下子宫切除术包括:腹腔镜全子宫切除术(laparoscopic total hysterectomy)、腹腔镜辅助阴式子宫切除术( laparoscopic assisted vaginal hysterectomy, LAVH )、腹腔镜筋膜内子宫切除术( laparoscopic intrafascial hysterectomy )、 | 陈玲娜 余剑琴 郑飞云 | 2009 | 实用医学杂志2009，25，21： | 24 |
| 19 | 腹腔镜胰头十二指肠切除术手术流程优化显示文摘腹腔镜手术切口小、视野清晰,微创优势明显,已成为21世纪外科学发展的主旋律。然而,腹腔镜胰头十二指肠切除术(laparoscopic pancreatoduodenectomy,LPD)切除脏器多,操作困难,消化道重建复杂,风险高。自1994年首次报道以来,LPD的发展经历了1994年至2007年的“山重水复疑无路”,2007年至2010年的“柳暗花明又一村”。2010年后,LPD在Mayo 诊所等医疗中心进入实用阶段[1]。2003年卢榜裕等[2]报道了国内首例LPD。笔者搜索万方数据库,发现仅有2篇文献的报道例数超过20例,最多仅26例[3],可见国内LPD发展缓慢,仍处于探索阶段,尚未形成成熟的手术流程。我们团队到Mayo 诊所观摩学习,体会到Kendrick和Cusati[4]提出的“六孔法”并不适合中国人相对瘦小的体型。因此建立适合中国人体型的LPD手术流程是在国内推广LPD的关键之一。 | 金巍巍 张人超 牟一平 徐晓武 周育成 严加费 张苗尊 | 2014 | 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志2014，3，6： | 24 |
| 20 | Clinical characteristics of incidental or unsuspected gallbladder cancers diagnosed during or after cholecystectomy: A systematic review and meta-analysis显示文摘AIM: To perform a systematic review of incidental or unsuspected gallbladder(GB) cancer diagnosed during or after cholecystectomy. METHODS: Data in Pub Med, EMBASE, and CochraneLibrary were reviewed and 26 publications were included in the meta-analysis. The inclusion criterion for incidental GB cancer was GB cancer diagnosed during or after cholecystectomy that was not suspected at a preoperative stage. Pooled proportions of the incidence, distribution of T stage, and revisional surgery of incidental GB cancer were analyzed.RESULTS: The final pooled population comprised 2145 patients with incidental GB cancers. Incidental GB cancers were found in 0.7% of cholecystectomies p e r f o r m e d f o r b e n i g n g a l l b l a d d e r d i s e a s e s o n preoperative diagnosis(95%CI: 0.004-0.012). Nearly 50% of the incidental GB cancers were stage T2 with a pooled proportion of 47.0%(95%CI: 0.421-0.519). T1 and T3 GB cancers were found at a similar frequency, with pooled proportions of 23.0%(95%CI: 0.178-0.291) and 25.1%(95%CI: 0.195-0.317), respectively. The pooled proportion that completed revisional surgery for curative intent was 40.9%(95%CI: 0.329-0.494). The proportion of patients with unresectable disease upon revisional surgery was 23.0%(95%CI: 0.177-0.294). CONCLUSION: A large proportion of incidental GB cancers were T2 and T3 lesions. Revisional surgery for radical cholecystectomy is warranted in T2 and more advanced cancers. | Kui Sun Choi Sae Byeol Choi Pyoungjae Park Wan Bae Kim Sang Yong Choi | 2015 | World Journal of Gastroenterology2015，21，4： | 24 |
您所在的机构暂未开通此部分的功能，请联系管理员