维普中文期刊产品整合服务

Testing the mantle plume hypothesis: an IODP effort to drill into the Kamchatka-Okhotsk Sea basement

查看全文 作  者:Yaoling [1,2,3]Niu;Xuefa [1,4]Shi;Tiegang [1,4]Li;Shiguo [1,5]Wu;Weidong [1,3]Sun;Rixiang [6]Zhu 高影响力作者 机构地区:[1]Laboratory for Marine Geology,Qingdao National Laboratory for Marine Science and Technology,Qingdao 266061,China;[2]Department of Earth Sciences,Durham University,Durham DH1 3LE,UK;[3]lnstitute of Oceanology,Chinese Acadermy of Sciences,Qingdao 266071.China;[4]First Institute of Oceanography,State Oceanic Administration,Qingdao 266061,China;[5]Institute of Deep-sea Science and Engineering,Chinese Acadery of Sciences,Sanya 572000,China;[6]Institute of Geology 8 Geophysics,Chinese Academy of Sciences,Beijing 100029,China高影响力机构 出  处:《Science Bulletin》索引2017年第62卷第21期,共9页高影响力期刊 基  金:supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (41130314, 41630968);Chinese Academy of Sciences Innovation (Y42217101L);grants from Qingdao National Laboratory for Marine Science and Technology (2015ASKJ03);the NSFC-Shandong Joint Fund for Marine Science Research Centers (U1606401) 摘  要:The great mantle plume debate(GPD) has been going on for ~15 years(Foulger and Natland, 2003;Anderson, 2004; Niu, 2005; Davies, 2005; Foulger, 2005; Campbell, 2005; Campbell and Davies, 2006),centered on whether mantle plumes exist as a result of Earth's cooling or whether their existence is purely required for convenience in explaining certain Earth phenomena(Niu, 2005). Despite the mounting evidence that many of the so-called plumes may be localized melting anomalies, the debate is likely to continue. We recognize that the slow progress of the debate results from communication difficulties.Many debaters may not truly appreciate(1) what the mantle plume hypothesis actually is, and(2) none of the petrological, geochemical and geophysical methods widely used can actually provide smoking-gun evidence for or against mantle plume hypothesis. In this short paper, we clarify these issues, and elaborate a geologically effective approach to test the hypothesis. According to the mantle plume hypothesis, a thermal mantle plume must originate from the thermal boundary layer at the core-mantle boundary(CMB), and a large mantle plume head is required to carry the material from the deep mantle to the surface. The plume head product in ocean basins is the oceanic plateau, which is a lithospheric terrane that is large(1000's km across), thick(>200 km), shallow(2–4 km high above the surrounding seafloors), buoyant(~1% less dense than the surrounding lithosphere), and thus must be preserved in the surface geology(Niu et al., 2003). The Hawaiian volcanism has been considered as the surface expression of a type mantle plume, but it does not seem to have a(known) plume head product. If this is true, the Hawaiian mantle plume in particular and the mantle plume hypothesis in general must be questioned. Therefore, whether there is an oceanic plateau-like product for the Hawaiian volcanism is key to testing the mantle plume hypothesis, and the Kamchatka-Okhotsk Sea basement is the best candidate to find out if it is indeed the Hawaiian mantle plume head product or not(Niu et al., 2003; Niu, 2004). 关 键 词:Mantle plume debate Geologically testing plume hypothesis Drilling into Kamchatka-Okhotsk Sea BASEMENT
相关文献

参考文献(30)

引证文献(8)

耦合文献(95)

网站首页 | 关于我们 | 联系我们 | 产品服务 | 客服中心 | 广告服务 | 版权声明 | 网站联盟 | 友情链接 | 售卡网点

版权所有© 渝B2-20050021-1 渝公网安备 50019002500403号 违法和不良信息举报中心

互联网出版许可证 新出网证(渝)字10号 全国400电话 - 免长途话费