| 8 | 信息质量专业硕士研究生课程设置显示文摘首个信息质量(IQ)专业硕士学位是为培养在行业和政府部门就职的专业人才,并为学生提供进一步深造机会而设置的。课程设置是以获美国计算机学会和国际信息系统协会批准的信息系统专业研究生培养方案示范课程和指导方针为指导,充分体现两大主要教育创新:(1)课程设计的跨学科方法;(2)理论与实践相结合。为适应行业发展需求,该课程的目标是要培养能够解决当前和未来信息质量问题的领军人物。采用问题式学习与基础学习相结合的教学方法,可以非常有效地帮助学生掌握课程内容。许多课程的内容都是以过去20多年的研究成果和实践为基础。课程设置旨在运用现代工具和技术,紧密地把信息质量理论与行业最佳实践有机地结合在一起,包含了对成功信息质量专业人员来说至关重要的一系列技能。信息质量是一个跨学科领域,涉及全面质量管理、数据库、信息质量核心知识、变更管理、项目管理以及信息质量政策和策略等领域。课程采用案例研究、动手实验、理论学习以及团队项目的方式进行教学,以丰富学生的学习经验。通过学习,学生将掌握信息质量领域广泛和深入的知识,具备解决实际问题,开展研究工作的能力。 | Yang W.Lee Elizabeth Pierce John Talburt Richard Y.Wang 朱宏伟 | 2008 | 中国科技资源导刊2008,40,6: | 0 |
| 9 | Assessment of tmiispai*ent and reproducible research practices in the psychiatry literature显示文摘Background Reproducibility is a cornerstone of scientific advancement;however,many published works may lack the core components needed for study reproducibility.Aims In this study,we evaluate the state of transparency and reproducibility in the field of psychiatry using specific indicators as proxies for these practices.Methods An increasing number of publications have investigated indicators of reproducibility,including research by Harwicke etal,from which we based the methodology for our observational,cross-sectional study.From a random 5-year sample of 300 publications in PubMed-indexed psychiatry journals,two researchers extracted data in a duplicate,blinded fashion using a piloted Google form.The publications were examined for indicators of reproducibility and transparency,which included availability of:materials,data,protocol,analysis script,open-access,conflict of interest,funding and online preregistration.Results This study ultimately evaluated 296 randomlyselected publications with a 3.20 median impact factor.Only 107 were available online.Most primary authors originated from USA,UK and the Netherlands.The top three publication types were cohort studies,surveys and clinical trials.Regarding indicators of reproducibility,17 publications gave access to necessary materials,four provided in-depth protocol and one contained raw data required to reproduce the outcomes.One publication offered its analysis script on request;four provided a protocol availability statement.Only 107 publications were publicly available:13 were registered in online repositories and four,ten and eight publications included their hypothesis,methods and analysis,respectively.Conflict of interest was addressed by 177 and reported by 31 publications.Of 185 publications with a funding statement,153 publications were funded and 32 were unfunded.Conclusions Currently,Psychiatry research has significant potential to improve adherence to reproducibility and transparency practices.Thus,this study presents a reference point for the state of reproducibility and transparency in Psychiatry literature.Future assessments are recommended to evaluate and encourage progress. | Caroline Elizabeth Sherry Jonathan Z Pollard Daniel Tritz Branden K Carr Aaron Pierce Matt Vassar | 2020 | General Psychiatry2020,33,1: | 0 |