|
|
|
题名
|
作者
|
年代
|
出处
|
被引量
|
| 1 | Mechanical Properties, Water Vapor Permeability and Water Affinity of Feather Keratin Films Plasticized with Sorbitol显示文摘 | Sílvia Maria Martelli Geovana Rocha Plácido Moore Jo?o Borges Laurindo | 2006 | Journal of Polymers and the Environment2006，，3： | 1 |
| 2 | Influence ofplasticizers on the water sorption isotherms and water vapor permeability of chicken feather keratin films 显示文摘 | Silvia M M Geovana M Sabrina S P | 2006 | LWT2006，39，3： | 1 |
| 3 | Molecular analysis of multiresistant porcine Salmonella enterica subsp, enterica serovar Bredeney isolates from Southern Brazil: identification of resistance genes,integrons and a group II intron显示文摘 | Geovana Brenner Michael Marisa Cardoso Stefan Schwarz | 2008 | J International Journal of Antimicrobial Agents2008，32，： | 1 |
| 4 | Stem cells and pain显示文摘ain can be defined as an unpleasant sensory and emotional experience caused by either actual or potential tissue damage or even resemble that unpleasant experience.For years,science has sought to find treatment alternatives,with minimal side effects,to relieve pain.However,the currently available pharmacological options on the market show significant adverse events.Therefore,the search for a safer and highly efficient analgesic treatment has become a priority.Stem cells(SCs)are non-specialized cells with a high capacity for replication,self-renewal,and a wide range of differentiation possibilities.In this review,we provide evidence that the immune and neuromodulatory properties of SCs can be a valuable tool in the search for ideal treatment strategies for different types of pain.With the advantage of multiple administration routes and dosages,therapies based on SCs for pain relief have demonstrated meaningful results with few downsides.Nonetheless,there are still more questions than answers when it comes to the mechanisms and pathways of pain targeted by SCs.Thus,this is an evolving field that merits further investigation towards the development of SCbased analgesic therapies,and this review will approach all of these aspects. | Matheus Deroco Veloso da Silva Maiara Piva Geovana Martelossi-Cebinelli Mariana Stinglin Rosa Ribas Beatriz Hoffmann Salles Bianchini Olivia K Heintz Rubia Casagrande Waldiceu A Verri Jr | 2023 | World Journal of Stem Cells2023，15，12： | 0 |
| 5 | A systematic scoping review of study methodology for randomized controlled trials investigating probiotics in athletic and physically active populations显示文摘Background:The purported ergogenic and health effects of probiotics have been a topic of great intrigue among researchers,practitioners,and the lay public alike.There has also been an increased research focus within the realm of sports science and exercise medicine on the athletic gut microbiota.However,compared to other ergogenic aids and dietary supplements,probiotics present unique study challenges.The objectives of this systematic scoping review were to identify and characterize study methodologies of randomized controlled trials investigating supplementation with probiotics in athletes and physically active individuals.Methods:Four databases(MEDLINE,CINAHL,Cochrane CENTRAL,and Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews)were searched for randomized controlled studies involving healthy athletes or physically active individuals.An intervention with probiotics and inclusion of a control and/or placebo group were essential.Only peer-reviewed articles in English were considered,and there were no date restrictions.Results were extracted and presented in tabular form to detail study protocols,characteristics,and outcomes.Bias in randomized controlled trials was determined with the RoB 2.0 tool.Results:A total of 45 studies were included in the review,with 35 using a parallel group design and 10 using a cross-over design.Approximately half the studies used a single probiotic and the other half a multi-strain preparation.The probiotic dose ranged from 2×10^(8)to 1×10^(11)colony forming units daily,and the length of intervention was between 7 and 150 days.Fewer than half the studies directly assessed gastrointestinal symptoms,gut permeability,or the gut microbiota.The sex ratio of participants was heavily weighted toward males,and only 3 studies exclusively investigated females.Low-level adverse events were reported in only 2 studies,although the methodology of reporting varied widely.The risk of bias was generally low,although details on randomization were lacking in some studies.Conclusion:There is a substantial body of research on the effects of prob iotic supplementation in healthy athletes and physically active individuals.Considerable heterogeneity in probiotic selection and dosage as well as outcome measures has made clinical and mechanistic interpretation challenging for both health care practitioners and researchers.Attention to issues of randomization of participants,treatments and interventions,selection of outcomes,demographics,and reporting of adverse events will facilitate more trustworthy interpretation of probiotic study results and inform evidence-based guidelines. | Alex E.Mohr David B.Pyne Geovana Silva Fogaça Leite Deborah Akins Jamie Pugh | 2024 | Journal of Sport and Health Science2024，13，1： | 0 |
您所在的机构暂未开通此部分的功能，请联系管理员