|
|
|
题名
|
作者
|
年代
|
出处
|
被引量
|
| 1 | Deep sedation during gastrointestinal endoscopy: Propofol-fentanyl and midazolam-fentanyl regimens显示文摘AIM: To compare deep sedation with propofol-fentanyl and midazolam-fentanyl regimens during upper gastrointestinal endoscopy. METHODS: After obtaining approval of the research ethics committee and informed consent, 200 patients were evaluated and referred for upper gastrointestinal endoscopy. Patients were randomized to receive propofol-fentanyl or midazolam-fentanyl (n = 100/group).We assessed the level of sedation using the observer's assessment of alertness/sedation (OAA/S) score and bispectral index (BIS). We evaluated patient and physician satisfaction, as well as the recovery time and complication rates. The statistical analysis was performed using SPSS statistical software and included the MannWhitney test, χ 2 test, measurement of analysis of variance, and the κ statistic. RESULTS: The times to induction of sedation, recovery, and discharge were shorter in the propofolfentanyl group than the midazolam-fentanyl group. According to the OAA/S score, deep sedation events occurred in 25% of the propofol-fentanyl group and 11% of the midazolam-fentanyl group (P = 0.014). Additionally, deep sedation events occurred in 19% of the propofol-fentanyl group and 7% of the midazolamfentanyl group according to the BIS scale (P = 0.039). There was good concordance between the OAA/S score and BIS for both groups (κ = 0.71 and κ = 0.63, respectively). Oxygen supplementation was required in 42% of the propofol-fentanyl group and 26% of the midazolam-fentanyl group (P = 0.025). The mean time to recovery was 28.82 and 44.13 min in the propofolfentanyl and midazolam-fentanyl groups, respectively (P < 0.001). There were no severe complications in either group. Although patients were equally satisfied with both drug combinations, physicians were more satisfied with the propofol-fentanyl combination. CONCLUSION: Deep sedation occurred with propofolfentanyl and midazolam-fentanyl, but was more frequent in the former. Recovery was faster in the propofol-fentanyl group. | Marcos Eduardo Lera dos Santos Fauze Maluf-Filho Dalton Marques Chaves Sergio Eiji Matuguma Edson Ide Gustavo de Oliveira Luz Thiago Ferreira de Souza Fernanda C Simoes Pessorrusso Eduardo Guimares Hourneaux de Moura Paulo Sakai | 2013 | World Journal of Gastroenterology2013，19，22： | 16 |
| 2 | Acute abdominal obstruction:Colon stent or emergency surgery? An evidence-based review显示文摘According to the American Cancer Society and Colorectal Cancer Statistics 2017,colorectal cancer(CRC) is one of the most common malignancies in the United States and the second leading cause of cancer death in the world in 2018.Previous studies demonstrated that 8%-29% of patients with primary CRC present malignant colonic obstruction(MCO). In the past, emergency surgery has been the primary treatment for MCO, although morbidity and surgical mortality rates are higher in these settings than in elective procedures. In the 1990 s, selfexpanding metal stents appeared and was a watershed in the treatment of patients in gastrointestinal surgical emergencies. The studies led to high expectations because the use of stents could prevent surgical intervention, such as colostomy, leading to lower morbidity and mortality, possibly resulting in higher quality of life. This review was designed to provide present evidence of the indication, technique, outcomes, benefits, and risks of these treatments in acute MCO through the analysis of previously published studies and current guidelines. | Igor Braga Ribeiro Diogo Turiani Hourneaux de Moura Christopher C Thompson Eduardo Guimaraes Hourneaux de Moura | 2019 | World Journal of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy2019，11，3： | 15 |
| 3 | Endoscopy vs surgery in the treatment of early gastric cancer:Systematic review显示文摘AIM: To report a systematic review,establishing the available data to an unpublished 2a strength of evidence,better handling clinical practice.METHODS: A systematic review was performed using MEDLINE,EMBASE,Cochrane,LILACS,Scopus and CINAHL databases. Information of the selected studies was extracted on characteristics of trial participants,inclusion and exclusion criteria,interventions(mainly,mucosal resection and submucosal dissection vs surgical approach) and outcomes(adverse events,different survival rates,mortality,recurrence and complete resection rates). To ascertain the validity of eligible studies,the risk of bias was measured using the Newcastle-Ottawa Quality Assessment Scale. The analysis of the absolute risk of the outcomes was performed using the software Rev Man,by computingrisk differences(RD) of dichotomous variables. Data on RD and 95%CIs for each outcome were calculated using the Mantel-Haenszel test and inconsistency was qualified and reported in χ2 and the Higgins method(I2). Sensitivity analysis was performed when heterogeneity was higher than 50%,a subsequent assay was done and other findings were compiled.RESULTS: Eleven retrospective cohort studies were selected. The included records involved 2654 patients with early gastric cancer that filled the absolute or expanded indications for endoscopic resection. Threeyear survival data were available for six studies(n = 1197). There were no risk differences(RD) after endoscopic and surgical treatment(RD = 0.01,95%CI:-0.02-0.05,P = 0.51). Five-year survival data(n = 2310) showed no difference between the two groups(RD = 0.01,95%CI:-0.01-0.03,P = 0.46). Recurrence data were analized in five studies(1331 patients) and there was no difference between the approaches(RD = 0.01,95%CI:-0.00-0.02,P = 0.09). Adverse event data were identified in eight studies(n = 2439). A significant difference was detected(RD =-0.08,95%CI:-0.10--0.05,P < 0.05),demonstrating better results with endoscopy. Mortality data were obtained in four studies(n = 1107). There was no difference between the groups(RD =-0.01,95%CI:-0.02-0.00,P = 0.22).CONCLUSION: Three-,5-year survival,recurrence and mortality are similar for both groups. Considering complication,endoscopy is better and,analyzing complete resection data,it is worse than surgery. | André Kondo Eduardo Guimaraes Hourneaux de Moura Wanderley Marques Bernardo Osmar Kenji Yagi Diogo Turiani Hourneaux de Moura Eduardo Turiani Hourneaux de Moura José Gon?alves Pereira Bravo Kendi Yamazaki Paulo Sakai | 2015 | World Journal of Gastroenterology2015，21，46： | 12 |
| 4 | Video capsule endoscopy vs double-balloon enteroscopy in the diagnosis of small bowel bleeding:A systematic review and metaanalysis显示文摘AIM To compare the diagnostic accuracy of video capsule endoscopy(VCE) and double-balloon enteroscopy(DBE) in cases of obscure gastrointestinal bleeding(OGIB) of vascular origin.METHODS MEDLINE(via PubMed), LILACS(via BVS) and Cochrane/CENTRAL virtual databases were searched for studies dated before 2017. We identified prospective and retrospective studies, including observational, cohort, single-blinded and multicenter studies, comparing VCE and DBE for the diagnosis of OGIB, and data of all the vascular sources of bleeding were collected. All patients were subjected to the same gold standard method. Relevant data were then extracted from each included study using a standardized extraction form. We calculated study variables(sensitivity, specificity, prevalence, positive and negative predictive values and accuracy) and performed a meta-analysis using Meta-Disc software.RESULTS In the per-patient analysis, 17 studies(1477 lesions) were included. We identified3150 exams(1722 VCE and 1428 DBE) in 2043 patients and identified 2248 sources of bleeding, 1467 of which were from vascular lesions. Of these lesions, 864(58.5%) were diagnosed by VCE, and 613(41.5%) were diagnosed by DBE. The pretest probability for bleeding of vascular origin was 54.34%. The sensitivity of DBE was 84%(95%CI: 0.82-0.86; heterogeneity: 78.00%), and the specificity was92%(95%CI: 0.89-0.94; heterogeneity: 92.0%). For DBE, the positive likelihood ratio was 11.29(95%CI: 4.83-26.40; heterogeneity: 91.6%), and the negative likelihood ratio was 0.20(95%CI: 0.15-0.27; heterogeneity: 67.3%). Performing DBE after CE increased the diagnostic yield of vascular lesion by 7%, from 83% to90%.CONCLUSION The diagnostic accuracy of detecting small bowel bleeding from a vascular source is increased with the use of an isolated video capsule endoscope compared with isolated DBE. However, concomitant use increases the detection rate of the bleeding source. | Hélcio Pedrosa Brito Igor Braga Ribeiro Diogo Turiani Hourneaux de Moura Wanderley Marques Bernardo Dalton Marques Chaves Rogério Kuga Ethan Dwane Maahs Robson Kiyoshi Ishida Eduardo Turiani Hourneaux de Moura Eduardo Guimaraes Hourneaux de Moura | 2018 | World Journal of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy2018，10，12： | 10 |
| 5 | Endoscopic stenting for inoperable malignant biliary obstruction: A systematic review and meta-analysis显示文摘AIM: To analyze through meta-analyses the benefits of two types of stents in the inoperable malignant biliary obstruction.METHODS: A systematic review of randomized clinical trials(RCT) was conducted, with the last update on March 2015, using EMBASE, CINAHL(EBSCO), MEDLINE, LILACS/CENTRAL(BVS), SCOPUS, CAPES(Brazil), and gray literature. Information of the selected studies was extracted in sight of six outcomes: primarily regarding dysfunction, complication and reintervention rates; and secondarily costs, survival, and patency time. The data about characteristics of trial participants, inclusion and exclusion criteria and types of stents were also extracted. The bias was mainly assessed through the JADAD scale. This meta-analysis was registered in the PROSPERO database by the number CRD42014015078. The analysis of the absolute risk of the outcomes was performed using the software Rev Man, by computing risk differences(RD) of dichotomous variables and mean differences(MD) of continuous variables. Data on RD and MD for each primary outcome were calculated using the MantelHaenszel test and inconsistency was qualified and reported in χ2 and the Higgins method(I2). Sensitivity analysis was performed when heterogeneity was higher than 50%, a subsequent assay was done and other findings were compiled. Student's t-test was used for the comparison of weighted arithmetic means regarding secondary outcomes.RESULTS: Initial searching identified 3660 studies; 3539 were excluded through title, repetition, and/or abstract, while 121 studies were fully assessed and were excluded mainly because they did not compare self-expanding metal stents(SEMS) and plastic stents(PS), leading to thirteen RCT selected, with 13 articles and 1133 subjects meta-analyzed. The mean age was 69.5 years old, that were affected mostly by bile duct(proximal) and pancreatic tumors(distal). The preferred SEMS diameter used was the 10 mm(30 Fr) and the preferred PS diameter used was 10 Fr. In the metaanalysis, SEMS had lower overall stent dysfunction compared to PS(21.6% vs 46.8%, P < 0.00001) and fewer re-interventions(21.6% vs 56.6%, P < 0.00001), with no difference in complications(13.7% vs 15.9%, P = 0.16). In the secondary analysis, the mean survival rate was higher in the SEMS group(182 d vs 150 d, P < 0.0001), with a higher patency period(250 d vs 124 d, P < 0.0001) and a lower cost per patient(4193.98 vs 4728.65 Euros, P < 0.0985).CONCLUSION: SEMS are associated with lower stent dysfunction, lower re-intervention rates, better survival, and higher patency time. Complications and costs showed no difference. | Leonardo Zorrón Pu Eduardo Guimaraes Hourneaux de Moura Wanderley Marques Bernardo Felipe Iankelevich Baracat Ernesto Quaresma Mendonca AndréKondo Gustavo Oliveira Luz Carlos Kiyoshi Furuya Júnior Everson Luiz de Almeida Artifon | 2015 | World Journal of Gastroenterology2015，21，47： | 10 |
| 6 | Comparison between endoscopic sphincterotomy vs endoscopic sphincterotomy associated with balloon dilation for removal of bile duct stones:A systematic review and meta-analysis based on randomized controlled trials显示文摘AIM To compare gallstones removal rate and incidence of bleeding, pancreatitis, use of mechanical lithotripsy, cholangitis and perforation between isolated sphincterotomy vs sphincterotomy associated with balloon dilation of papilla in choledocholithiasis through the meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials. METHODS We conducted a systematic review according to the PRISMA guidelines. Literature search was restricted to randomized controlled trials(RCTs) on Med Line, Cochrane Library, LILACS, and EMBASE database platforms in July 2017. The manual search included references of retrieved articles. We extracted data focusing on outcomes: The primary endpoint was the stones removal rate; Secondary endpoints were rates of pancreatitis, bleeding, use of mechanical lithotripsy(ML), perforation and cholangitis. RESULTS Eleven RCTs with 1824 patients were included. EST was associated with more post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography(ERCP) bleeding [FE RD-0.02, CI(-0.03,-0.00), I2 = 33%, P = 0.05] and more need of mechanical lithotripsy in general [RE RD-0.16, CI(-0.25,-0.06), I2 = 90%, P = 0.002] and in subgroup analysis of stones greater than 15 mm [RE RD-0.20, CI(-0.38,-0.02), I2 = 82%, P = 0.003]. Incidence of pancreatitis [FE RD-0.01, CI(-0.03, 0.01), I2 = 0, P = 0.36], cholangitis [FE RD-0.00, CI(-0.01, 0.01), I2 =0, P = 0.97] and perforation [FE RD-0.01, CI(-0.01, 0.00), I2 = 0, P = 0.23] was similar between the groups as well as similar stone removal rates in general [FE RD-0.01, CI(-0.01, 0.04), I2 = 0, P = 0.23] and pooled analysis of stones greater than 15 mm [FE RD-0.02, CI(-0.02, 0.07), I2 = 11%, P = 0.31]. CONCLUSION Through meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials we found that isolated sphincterotomy was associated with more post-ERCP bleeding and more need for mechanical lithotripsy. However, there was no statistical difference in the stone removal rate between isolated sphincterotomy and sphincterotomy associated with balloon dilation in the approach to remove gallstones. | Cesar Capel de Clemente Junior Wanderley Marques Bernardo Tomazo Prince Franzini Gustavo Oliveira Luz Marcos Eduardo Lera dos Santos Jonah Maxwell Cohen Diogo Turiani Hourneaux de Moura Fábio Ramalho Tavares Marinho Martin Coronel Paulo Sakai Eduardo Guimaraes Hourneaux de Moura | 2018 | World Journal of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy2018，10，8： | 8 |
| 7 | Role of endoscopic vacuum therapy in the management of gastrointestinal transmural defects显示文摘A gastrointestinal(GI) transmural defect is defined as total rupture of the GI wall,and these defects can be divided into three categories: perforations,leaks,and fistulas. Surgical management of these defects is usually challenging and may be associated with high morbidity and mortality rates. Recently,several novel endoscopic techniques have been developed,and endoscopy has become a firstline approach for therapy of these conditions. The use of endoscopic vacuum therapy(EVT) is increasing with favorable results. This technique involves endoscopic placement of a sponge connected to a nasogastric tube into the defect cavity or lumen. This promotes healing via five mechanisms,including macrodeformation,microdeformation,changes in perfusion,exudate control,and bacterial clearance,which is similar to the mechanisms in which skin wounds are treated with commonly employed wound vacuums. EVT can be used in the upper GI tract,small bowel,biliopancreatic regions,and lower GI tract,with variable success rates and a satisfactory safety profile. In this article,we review and discuss the mechanism of action,materials,techniques,efficacy,and safety of EVT in the management of patients with GI transmural defects. | Diogo Turiani Hourneaux de Moura Bruna Furia Buzetti Hourneaux de Moura Michael A Manfredi Kelly E Hathorn Ahmad N Bazarbashi Igor Braga Ribeiro Eduardo Guimaraes Hourneaux de Moura Christopher C Thompson | 2019 | World Journal of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy2019，11，5： | 6 |
| 8 | Propofol vs traditional sedatives for sedation in endoscopy:A systematic review and meta-analysis显示文摘BACKGROUND Propofol is commonly used for sedation during endoscopic procedures.Data suggests its superiority to traditional sedatives used in endoscopy including benzodiazepines and opioids with more rapid onset of action and improved postprocedure recovery times for patients.However,Propofol requires administration by trained healthcare providers,has a narrow therapeutic index,lacks an antidote and increases risks of cardio-pulmonary complications.AIM To compare,through a systematic review of the literature and meta-analysis,sedation with propofol to traditional sedatives with or without propofol during endoscopic procedures.METHODS A literature search was performed using MEDLINE,Scopus,EMBASE,the Cochrane Library,Scopus,LILACS,BVS,Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials,and The Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature databases.The last search in the literature was performed on March,2019 with no restriction regarding the idiom or the year of publication.Only randomized clinical trials with full texts published were included.We divided sedation therapies to the following groups:(1)Propofol versus benzodiazepines and/or opiate sedatives;(2)Propofol versus Propofol with benzodiazepine and/or opioids;and(3)Propofol with adjunctive benzodiazepine and opioid versus benzodiazepine and opioid.The following outcomes were addressed:Adverse events,patient satisfaction with type of sedation,endoscopists satisfaction with sedation administered,dose of propofol administered and time to recovery post procedure.Meta-analysis was performed using RevMan5 software version 5.39.RESULTS A total of 23 clinical trials were included(n=3854)from the initial search of 6410 articles.For Group I(Propofol vs benzodiazepine and/or opioids):The incidence of bradycardia was not statistically different between both sedation arms(RD:-0.01,95%CI:-0.03–+0.01,I2:22%).In 10 studies,the incidence of hypotension was not statistically difference between sedation arms(RD:0.01,95%CI:-0.02–+0.04,I2:0%).Oxygen desaturation was higher in the propofol group but not statistically different between groups(RD:-0.03,95%CI:-0.06–+0.00,I2:25%).Patients were more satisfied with their sedation in the benzodiazepine+opioid group compared to those with monotherapy propofol sedation(MD:+0.89,95%CI:+0.62–+1.17,I2:39%).The recovery time after the procedure showed high heterogeneity even after outlier withdrawal,there was no statistical difference between both arms(MD:-15.15,95%CI:-31.85–+1.56,I2:99%).For Group II(Propofol vs propofol with benzodiazepine and/or opioids):Bradycardia had a tendency to occur in the Propofol group with benzodiazepine and/or opioidassociated(RD:-0.08,95%CI:-0.13–-0.02,I2:59%).There was no statistical difference in the incidence of bradycardia(RD:-0.00,95%CI:-0.08–+0.08,I2:85%),desaturation(RD:-0.00,95%CI:-0.03–+0.02,I2:44%)or recovery time(MD:-2.04,95%CI:-6.96–+2.88,I2:97%)between sedation arms.The total dose of propofol was higher in the propofol group with benzodiazepine and/or opiates but with high heterogeneity.(MD:70.36,95%CI:+53.11–+87.60,I2:61%).For Group III(Propofol with benzodiazepine and opioid vs benzodiazepine and opioid):Bradycardia and hypotension was not statistically significant between groups(RD:-0.00,95%CI:-0.002–+0.02,I2:3%;RD:0.04,95%CI:-0.05–+0.13,I2:77%).Desaturation was evaluated in two articles and was higher in the propofol+benzodiazepine+opioid group,but with high heterogeneity(RD:0.15,95%CI:0.08–+0.22,I2:95%).CONCLUSION This meta-analysis suggests that the use of propofol alone or in combination with traditional adjunctive sedatives is safe and does not result in an increase in negative outcomes in patients undergoing endoscopic procedures. | Aureo Augusto de Almeida Delgado Diogo Turiani Hourneaux de Moura Igor Braga Ribeiro Ahmad Najdat Bazarbashi Marcos Eduardo Lera dos Santos Wanderley Marques Bernardo Eduardo Guimaraes Hourneaux de Moura | 2019 | World Journal of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy2019，11，12： | 6 |
| 9 | Pancreatitis after endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography:A narrative review显示文摘Acute post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography pancreatitis(PEP)is a feared and potentially fatal complication that can be as high as up to 30%in high-risk patients.Pre-examination measures,during the examination and after the examination are the key to technical and clinical success with a decrease in adverse events.Several studies have debated on the subject,however,numerous topics remain controversial,such as the effectiveness of prophylactic medications and the amylase dosage time.This review was designed to provide an update on the current scientific evidence regarding PEP available in the literature. | Igor Braga Ribeiro Epifanio Silvino do Monte Junior Antonio Afonso Miranda Neto Igor Mendonça Proença Diogo Turiani Hourneaux de Moura Mauricio Kazuyoshi Minata Edson Ide Marcos Eduardo Lera dos Santos Gustavo de Oliveira Luz Sergio Eiji Matuguma Spencer Cheng Renato Baracat Eduardo Guimarães Hourneaux de Moura | 2021 | World Journal of Gastroenterology2021，27，20： | 5 |
| 10 | Duodenal stenting for malignant gastric outlet obstruction:Prospective study显示文摘AIM:To evaluate the results of duodenal stenting for palliation of gastroduodenal malignant obstruction by using a gastric outlet obstruction score (GOOS).METHODS:A prospective,non-randomized study was performed at a tertiary center between August 2005 and April 2010.Patients were eligible if they had malignant gastric outlet obstruction (GOO) and were not candidates for surgical treatment.Medical history and patient demographics were collected at baseline.Scheduled interviews were made on the day of the procedure and 15,30,90 and 180 d later or unscheduled as necessary.RESULTS:Fifteen patients (6 male,9 female;median age 61 years) with GOO who had undergone duodenal stenting were evaluated.Ten patients had metastasis at baseline (66.6%) and 14 were unable to accept oral intake (93.33%),including 7 patients who were using a feeding tube.Laboratory data showed biliary obstruction in eight cases (53.33%);all were submitted to biliary drainage.Two patients developed obstructive symptoms due to tumor ingrowth after 30 d and another due to tumor overgrowth after 180 d.Two cases of stent migration occurred.A good response to treatment was observed,with a mean time of approximately 1 d (19 h) until toleration of a liquid diet and slightly more than 2 d for both soft solids (51 h) and a solid food/normal diet (55 h).The mean time to first failure to maintain liquid intake (GOOS ≥ 1) was 93 d.During follow-up,the mean time to first failure to maintain the previously achieved GOOS of 2-3 (solid/semi-solid food),considered technical failure,was 71 d.On the basis of oral intake a GOOS is defined:0 for no oral intake;1 for liquids only;2 for soft solids only;3 for lowresidue or full diet.CONCLUSION:Enteral stenting to alleviate gastroduodenal malignant obstruction improves quality of life in patients with limited life expectancy,which can be evaluated by using a GOO scoring system. | Eduardo Guimaräes Hourneaux Moura Flávio Coelho Ferreira Spencer Cheng Diogo Turiani Hourneaux Moura Paulo Sakai Bruno Zilberstain | 2012 | World Journal of Gastroenterology2012，18，9： | 5 |
| 11 | Propofol vs midazolam sedation for elective endoscopy in patients with cirrhosis:A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials显示文摘BACKGROUND Patients with cirrhosis frequently require sedation for elective endoscopic procedures.Several sedation protocols are available,but choosing an appropriate sedative in patients with cirrhosis is challenging.AIM To conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis to compare propofol and midazolam for sedation in patients with cirrhosis during elective endoscopic procedures in an attempt to understand the best approach.METHODS This systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted using the PRISMA guidelines.Electronic searches were performed using MEDLINE,EMBASE,Central Cochrane,LILACS databases.Only randomized control trials(RCTs)were included.The outcomes studied were procedure time,recovery time,discharge time,and adverse events(bradycardia,hypotension,and hypoxemia).The risk of bias assessment was performed using the Revised Cochrane Risk-of-Bias tool for randomized trials(RoB-2).Quality of evidence was evaluated by GRADEpro.The meta-analysis was performed using Review Manager.RESULTS The search yielded 3,576 records.Out of these,8 RCTs with a total of 596 patients(302 in the propofol group and 294 in the midazolam group)were included for the final analysis.Procedure time was similar between midazolam and propofol groups(MD:0.25,95%CI:-0.64 to 1.13,P=0.59).Recovery time(MD:-8.19,95%CI:-10.59 to-5.79,P<0.00001).and discharge time were significantly less in the propofol group(MD:-12.98,95%CI:-18.46 to-7.50,P<0.00001).Adverse events were similar in both groups(RD:0.02,95%CI:0-0.04,P=0.58).Moreover,no significant difference was found for bradycardia(RD:0.03,95%CI:-0.01 to 0.07,P=0.16),hypotension(RD:0.03,95%CI:-0.01 to 0.07,P=0.17),and hypoxemia(RD:0.00,95%CI:-0.04 to 0.04,P=0.93).Five studies had low risk of bias,two demonstrated some concerns,and one presented high risk.The quality of the evidence was very low for procedure time,recovery time,and adverse events;while low for discharge time.CONCLUSION This systematic review and meta-analysis based on RCTs show that propofol has shorter recovery and patient discharge time as compared to midazolam with a similar rate of adverse events.These results suggest that propofol should be the preferred agent for sedation in patients with cirrhosis. | John Alexander Lata Guacho Diogo Turiani Hourneaux de Moura Igor Braga Ribeiro Alberto Machado da Ponte Neto Shailendra Singh Marina Gammaro Baldavira Tucci Wanderley Marques Bernardo Eduardo Guimarães Hourneaux de Moura | 2020 | World Journal of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy2020，12，8： | 4 |
| 12 | Role of pancreatography in the endoscopic management of encapsulated pancreatic collections-review and new proposed classification显示文摘Pancreatic fluids collections are local complications related to acute or chronic pancreatitis and may require intervention when symptomatic and/or complicated.Within the last decade,endoscopic management of these collections via endoscopic ultrasound-guided transmural drainage has become the gold standard treatment for encapsulated pancreatic collections with high clinical success and lower morbidity compared to traditional surgery and percutaneous drainage.Proper understanding of anatomic landmarks,including assessment of the main pancreatic duct and any associated lesions–such as disruptions and strictures-are key to achieving clinical success,reducing the need for reintervention or recurrence,especially in cases with suspected disconnected pancreatic duct syndrome.Additionally,proper review of imaging and anatomic landmarks,including collection location,are pivotal to determine type and size of pancreatic stenting as well as approach using long-term transmural indwelling plastic stents.Pancreatography to adequately assess the main pancreatic duct may be performed by two methods:Either non-invasively using magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography or endoscopically via retrograde cholangiopancreatography.Despite the critical need to understand anatomy via pancrea tography and assess the main pancreatic duct,a standardized approach or uniform assessment strategy has not been described in the literature.Therefore,the aim of this review was to clarify the role of pancreatography in the endoscopic management of encapsulated pancreatic collections and to propose a new classification system to aid in proper assessment and endoscopic treatment. | Igor Mendonca Proença Marcos Eduardo Lera dos Santos Diogo Turiani Hourneaux de Moura Igor Braga Ribeiro Sergio Eiji Matuguma Spencer Cheng Thomas R McCarty Epifanio Silvino do Monte Junior Paulo Sakai Eduardo Guimaraes Hourneaux de Moura | 2020 | World Journal of Gastroenterology2020，26，45： | 3 |
| 13 | Papillary fistulotomy vs conventional cannulation for endoscopic biliary access:A prospective randomized trial显示文摘AIM To compare the cannulation success, biochemical profile, and complications of the papillary fistulotomy technique vs catheter and guidewire standard access.METHODS From July 2010 to May 2017, patients were prospectively randomized into two groups: Cannulation with a catheter and guidewire(Group Ⅰ) and papillary fistulotomy(Group Ⅱ). Amylase, lipase and C-reactive protein at T0, as well as 12 h and 24 h after endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography, and complications(pancreatitis, bleeding, perforation) were recorded.RESULTS We included 102 patients(66 females and 36 males, mean age 59.11 ± 18.7 years). Group Ⅰ and Group Ⅱ had 51 patients each. The successful cannulation rates were 76.5% and 100%, respectively(P = 0.0002). Twelve patients(23.5%) in Group Ⅰ had a difficult cannulation and underwent fistulotomy, which led to successful secondary biliary access(Failure Group). The complication rate was 13.7%(2 perforations and 5 mild pancreatitis) vs 2.0%(1 patient with perforation and pancreatitis) in Groups Ⅰ and Ⅱ, respectively(P = 0.0597). CONCLUSION Papillary fistulotomy was more effective than guidewire cannulation, and it was associated with a lower profile of amylase and lipase. Complications were similar in both groups. | Carlos Kiyoshi Furuya Paulo Sakai Fabio Ramalho Tavares Marinho Jose Pinhata Otoch Spencer Cheng Lívia Lemes Prudencio Eduardo Guimaraes Hourneaux de Moura Everson Luiz de Almeida Artifon | 2018 | World Journal of Gastroenterology2018，24，16： | 2 |
| 14 | Treatment of high-grade dysplasia and intramucosal carcinoma using radiofrequency ablation or endoscopic mucosal resection + radiofrequency ablation: Meta-analysis and systematic review显示文摘BACKGROUND The progression of Barrett's esophagus(BE) to early esophageal carcinoma occurs sequentially; the metaplastic epithelium develops from a low-grade dysplasia to a high-grade dysplasia(HGD), resulting in early esophageal carcinoma and,eventually, invasive carcinoma. Endoscopic approaches including resection and ablation can be used in the treatment of this condition.AIM To compare the effectiveness of radiofrequency ablation(RFA) vs endoscopic mucosal resection(EMR) + RFA in the endoscopic treatment of HGD and intramucosal carcinoma.METHODS In accordance with PRISMA guidelines, this systematic review included studies comparing the two endoscopic techniques(EMR + RFA and RFA alone) in the treatment of HGD and intramucosal carcinoma in patients with BE. Our analysis included studies involving adult patients of any age with BE with HGD or intramucosal carcinoma. The studies compared RFA and EMR + RFA methods were included regardless of randomization status.RESULTS The seven studies included in this review represent a total of 1950 patients, with742 in the EMR + RFA group and 1208 in the RFA alone group. The use of EMR +RFA was significantly more effective in the treatment of HGD [RD 0.35(0.15,0.56)] than was the use of RFA alone. The evaluated complications(stenosis,bleeding, and thoracic pain) were not significantly different between the two groups.CONCLUSION Endoscopic resection in combination with RFA is a safe and effective method in the treatment of HGD and intramucosal carcinoma, with higher rates of remission and no significant differences in complication rates when compared to the use of RFA alone. | Mileine Valente de Matos Alberto Machado da Ponte-Neto Diogo Turiani Hourneaux de Moura Ethan Dwane Maahs Dalton Marques Chaves Elisa Ryoka Baba Edson Ide Rubens Sallum Wanderley Marques Bernardo Eduardo Guimar?es Hourneaux de Moura | 2019 | World Journal of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy2019，11，3： | 2 |
| 15 | Use of omental patch and endoscopic closure technique as an alternative to surgery after endoscopic full thickness resection of gastric intestinal stromal tumors: A series of cases显示文摘BACKGROUND Gastrointestinal stromal tumors(GISTs)originate from interstitial cells of Cajal.GISTs can occur anywhere along the gastrointestinal tract.Large lesions have traditionally been removed surgically.However,with recent innovations in advanced endoscopy,GISTs located within the stomach are now removed endoscopically.We describe a new innovative endoscopic technique to close large and hard to access defects after endoscopic full-thickness resection of gastric GISTs.CASE SUMMARY We present a series of three patients who were diagnosed with a gastric GIST.All patients underwent full-thickness endoscopic resection.In all cases,for closure of the surgical bed,conventional endoscopic techniques including hemoclips,endoloop and suturing were unsuccessful.We performed a new technique in which we pulled omental fat into the gastric lumen and completely closed the defect using endoscopic devices.All patients performed well post-procedure and computed tomography was carried out one day after the procedures which showed no extravasation of contrast.CONCLUSION The omental plug technique may be used as an alternative to surgery in selected cases of gastric perforation. | Amit H Sachdev Shahzad Iqbal Igor Braga Ribeiro Diogo Turiani Hourneaux de Moura | 2020 | World Journal of Clinical Cases2020，8，1： | 2 |
| 16 | Acute bleeding after argon plasma coagulation for weight regain after gastric bypass: A case report显示文摘Roux-en-Y gastric bypass(RYGB)is the most commonly performed surgical procedure used to treat obesity worldwide.Despite satisfactory results in terms of weight loss,over time many patients experience weight regain.There are many factors that contribute to weight regain after RYGB,including the diameter of the gastric-jejunal anastomosis(GJA).One of the most commonly performed endoscopic procedures for weight regain after RYGB is argon plasma coagulation(APC).We report a case of hematemesis after outlet revision with APC.We highlight several treatment modalities that can be used to treat this complication.CASE SUMMARY A 45-year-old female with a history of weight regain after RYGB was referred for possible endoscopic treatment for weight regain.On endoscopic evaluation,the diameter of the GJA was 22 mm.Due to the dilated GJA,treatment with APC was performed.Several months later she reported a return of poor satiety and an increased appetite.A repeat endoscopy was then performed.The GJA was approximately 15 mm and was incompetent.APC was performed.One day post procedure she had four episodes of hematemesis.An endoscopy was performed and a large ulcer with a visible arterial vessel was visualized at the GJA.Coagulation was attempted using a Coagrasper and after initial contact with the vessel,the vessel started oozing.Due to fibrosis and the depth of ulceration in the area,clips and repeat APC could not be used.Therefore,an attempt to inject epinephrine injection was made.However,persistent oozing was noted.As a result,hemostatic powder was applied to the region of the bleeding vessel.Subsequently,no more bleeding was observed.On follow-up,the patient remained hemodynamically stable and a second look endoscopy was not performed.The patient was discharged three days later.CONCLUSION APC revision of the GJA is known to be a relatively safe and effective strategy to manage weight regain post RYGB.Anastomotic site bleeding is an infrequent and potentially life-threatening complication associated with this therapy.Endoscopic management is the first line therapy used to achieve hemostasis in these cases. | Diogo Turiani Hourneaux de Moura Amit H Sachdev Po-Wen Lu Igor Braga Ribeiro Christopher C Thompson | 2019 | World Journal of Clinical Cases2019，7，15： | 1 |
| 17 | Antibiotic prophylaxis to prevent complications in endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography:A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials显示文摘BACKGROUND The prophylactic use of antibiotics in endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography(ERCP)is still controversial.AIM To assess whether antibiotic prophylaxis reduces the rates of complications in patients undergoing elective ERCP.METHODS This systematic review and meta-analysis were performed following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis guidelines.A comprehensive search of multiple electronic databases was performed.Only randomized controlled trials were included.The outcomes analyzed included bacteremia,cholangitis,sepsis,pancreatitis,and mortality.The risk of bias was assessed by the Cochrane revised Risk-of-Bias tool for randomized controlled trials.The quality of evidence was assessed by the Grading of Recommendation Assessment,Development,and Evaluation.Meta-analysis was performed using the Review Manager 5.4 software.RESULTS Ten randomized controlled trials with a total of 1757 patients that compared the use of antibiotic and non-antibiotic prophylaxis in patients undergoing elective ERCP were included.There was no significant difference between groups regarding incidence of cholangitis after ERCP[risk difference(RD)=-0.02,95%confidence interval(CI):-0.05,0.02,P=0.32,cholangitis in patients with suspected biliary obstruction(RD=0.02,95%CI:-0.08 to 0.13,P=0.66),cholangitis on intravenous antibiotic prophylaxis(RD=-0.02,95%CI:-0.05 to 0.01,P=0.25),septicemia(RD=-0.02,95%CI:-0.06 to 0.01,P=0.25),pancreatitis(RD=-0.02,95%CI:-0.06 to 0.01,P=0.19),and allcause mortality(RD=0.00,95%CI:-0.01 to 0.01,P=0.71).However,the antibiotic prophylaxis group presented a 7%risk reduction in the incidence of bacteremia(RD=-0.07,95%CI:-0.14 to-0.01,P=0.03).CONCLUSION The prophylactic use of antibiotics in patients undergoing elective ERCP reduces the risk of bacteremia but does not appear to have an impact on the rates of cholangitis,septicemia,pancreatitis,and mortality. | Maria Fernanda Shinin Merchan Diogo Turiani Hourneaux de Moura Guilherme Henrique Peixoto de Oliveira Igor Mendonça Proença Epifanio Silvino do Monte Junior Edson Ide Caroline Moll Sergio A Sánchez-Luna Wanderley Marques Bernardo Eduardo Guimarães Hourneaux de Moura | 2022 | World Journal of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy2022，14，11： | 1 |
| 18 | Endoscopic Detection of Early Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma in Patients with Achalasia: Narrow-Band Imaging versus Lugol’s Staining显示文摘 | Edson Ide Fred Olavo Arag?o Andrade Carneiro Mariana Souza Varella Fraz?o Dalton Marques Chaves Rubens Ant?nio Aissar Sallum Eduardo Guimar?es Hourneaux de Moura Paulo Sakai Ivan Cecconello Fauze Maluf-Filho Everson L. A. Artifon | 2013 | Journal of Oncology2013，，： | 1 |
| 19 | A novel sampling method for the investigation of gut microbiota显示文摘AIM: In order to characterize the qualitative and quantitative microorganisms in different sites of the lower digestive tract (LDT) in healthy volunteers, a specific technique was developed for collecting mucous of the distal ileum, colon and rectum. METHODS: A polyethylene tube was designed to go through the colonoscope channel with a No. 8 French tube. In order to avoid internal contamination, the distal extremity was protected with a membrane of microfilm after being sterilized in ethilene oxid. To facilitate the aspiration of a precise volume, its interior was coated with silicone. One hundred microlliter (0.1 mL) sample of mucous was collected and transferred into an Eppenddorff tube containing nine hundred microlliter (0.9 mL) of VMGA-3 (viable medium of Goteborg). This procedure was repeated at each site of the LDT with a new sterilized catheter. RESULTS: All sites revealed the 'non pathogenic' anaerobic bacteria Veillonella sp (average 105 colony forming units/mL-CFU/mL), allowing to conclude an environment of low oxidation-reduction potential (redox) in the LDT. It was also characterized the presence of Klebisiella sp with significant statistical predominance (SSP) in the ileum. Enterobacter sp was found with SSP in the sigmoid colon, Bacteroides sp non-pigmented (npg) and E.coli with SSP in the sigmoid colon and rectum, Enterococcus sp and Lactobacillus sp with SSP in the rectum, all in a mean concentration of 105 CFU/mL. CONCLUSION: This procedure is feasible and efficient and can point out a similar distribution of the aerobic and anaerobic bacteria with the presence of biological markers of normal microbiota in the LDT. | Alina Guimares Quintanilha Bruno Zilberstein Manoel A A Santos Denis Pajecki Eduardo Guimares Hourneaux Moura Paulo Roberto Arruda Alves Fauze Maluf-Filho Ivan Cecconello | 2007 | World Journal of Gastroenterology2007，13，29： | 1 |
| 20 | Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography drainage for palliation of malignant hilar biliary obstruction——stent-in-stent or side-by-side?A systematic review and meta-analysis显示文摘BACKGROUND Biliary drainage,either by the stent-in-stent(SIS)or side-by-side(SBS)technique,is often required when treating a malignant hilar biliary obstruction(MHBO).Both methods differ from each other and have distinct advantages.AIM To compare both techniques regarding their efficacy and safety in achieving drainage of MHBO.METHODS A comprehensive search of multiple electronic databases(MEDLINE,Embase,LILACS,BIREME,Cochrane)was conducted and grey literature from their inception until December 2020 with no restrictions regarding the year of publication or language,since there was at least an abstract in English.The included studies compared SIS and SBS techniques through endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography.Outcomes analyzed included technical and clinical success,early and late adverse events(AEs),stent patency,reintervention,and procedure-related mortality.RESULTS Four cohort studies and one randomized controlled trial evaluating a total of 250 patients(127 in the SIS group and 123 in the SBS group)were included in this study.There were no statistically significant differences between the two groups concerning the evaluated outcomes,except for stent patency,which was higher in the SIS compared with the SBS technique[mean difference(d)=33.31;95%confidence interval:9.73 to 56.90,I2=45%,P=0.006].CONCLUSION The SIS method showed superior stent patency when compared to SBS for achieving bilateral drainage in MHBO.Both techniques are equivalent in terms of technical success,clinical success,rates of both early and late AEs,reintervention,and procedure-related mortality. | Gabriel Mayo Vieira de Souza Igor Braga Ribeiro Mateus Pereira Funari Diogo Turiani Hourneaux de Moura Maria Vitória Cury Vieira Scatimburgo João Remíde Freitas Júnior Sergio A Sánchez-Luna Renato Baracat Eduardo Turiani Hourneaux de Moura Wanderley Marques Bernardo Eduardo Guimarães Hourneaux de Moura | 2021 | World Journal of Hepatology2021，13，5： | 1 |
您所在的机构暂未开通此部分的功能，请联系管理员