|
|
|
题名
|
作者
|
年代
|
出处
|
被引量
|
| 1 | Management and prevention of acute and chronic lateral ankle instability in athletic patient populations显示文摘Acute and chronic lateral ankle instability are common in high-demand patient populations. If not managed appropriately, patients may experience recurrent instability, chronic pain, osteochondral lesions of the talus, premature osteoarthritis, and other significantlong-term disability. Certain populations, including young athletes, military personnel and those involved in frequent running, jumping, and cutting motions, are at increased risk. Proposed risk factors include prior ankle sprain, elevated body weight or body mass index, female gender, neuromuscular deficits, postural imbalance, foot/ankle malalignment, and exposure to at-risk athletic activity. Prompt, accurate diagnosis is crucial, and evidence-based, functional rehabilitation regimens have a proven track record in returning active patients to work and sport. When patients fail to improve with physical therapy and external bracing, multiple surgical techniques have been described with reliable results, including both anatomic and nonanatomic reconstructive methods. Anatomic repair of the lateral ligamentous complex remains the gold standard for recurrent ankle instability, and it effectively restores native ankle anatomy and joint kinematics while preserving physiologic ankle and subtalar motion. Further preventative measures may minimize the risk of ankle instability in athletic cohorts, including prophylactic bracing and combined neuromuscular and proprioceptive training programs. These interventions have demonstrated benefit in patients at heightened risk for lateral ankle sprain and allow active cohorts to return to full activity without adversely affecting athletic performance. | Brendan J Mc Criskin Kenneth L Cameron Justin D Orr Brian R Waterman | 2015 | World Journal of Orthopedics2015，6，2： | 20 |
| 2 | Nationwide trends and predictors of inpatient mortality in 83884 transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt显示文摘AIM: To evaluate and validate the national trends and predictors of in-patient mortality of transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt(TIPS) in 15 years.METHODS: Using the National Inpatient Sample which is a part of Health Cost and Utilization Project, we identified a discharge-weighted national estimate of 83884 TIPS procedures performed in the United States from 1998 to 2012 using international classification of diseases-9 procedural code 39.1. The demographic, hospital and co-morbility data were analyzed using a multivariant analysis. Using multi-nominal logistic regression analysis, we determined predictive factors related to increases in-hospital mortality. Comorbidity measures are in accordance to the Comorbidity Software designed by the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality.RESULTS: Overall, 12.3% of patients died during hospitalization with downward trend in-hospitalmortality with the mean length of stay of 10.8 ± 13.1 d. Notable, African American patients(OR = 1.809 vs Caucasian patients, P < 0.001), transferred patients(OR = 1.347 vs non-transferred, P < 0.001), emergency admissions(OR = 3.032 vs elective cases, P < 0.001), patients in the Northeast region(OR = 1.449 vs West, P < 0.001) had significantly higher odds of inhospital mortality. Number of diagnoses and number of procedures showed positive correlations with in-hospital death(OR = 1.249 per one increase in number of procedures). Patients diagnosed with acute respiratory failure(OR = 8.246), acute kidney failure(OR = 4.359), hepatic encephalopathy(OR = 2.217) and esophageal variceal bleeding(OR = 2.187) were at considerably higher odds of in-hospital death compared with ascites(OR = 0.136, P < 0.001). Comorbidity measures with the highest odds of in-hospital death were fluid and electrolyte disorders(OR = 2.823), coagulopathy(OR = 2.016), and lymphoma(OR = 1.842).CONCLUSION: The overall mortality of the TIPS procedure is steadily decreasing, though the length of stay has remained relatively constant. Specific patient ethnicity, location, transfer status, primary diagnosis and comorbidities correlate with increased odds of TIPS in-hospital death. | Edward Wolfgang Lee Andrew Kuei Sammy Saab Ronald W Busuttil Francisco Durazo Steven-Huy Han Mohamed M El-Kabany Justin P Mc Williams Stephen T Kee | 2016 | World Journal of Gastroenterology2016，22，25： | 7 |
| 3 | Development and evaluationof a real-time PCR assay for Detestion of KlebsiellaPneumoniae Carbapenemase genes显示文摘 | Justin MC Audrey NS Charles EH | 2009 | JClini Microbiol2009，47，2： | 1 |
| 4 | Operational strategies to achieve and maintain malaria elimination 显示文摘 | Moonen B Justin MC Robert WS | 2010 | Lancet2010，376，9752： | 1 |
| 5 | Development and evaluation of a real-time PCR assay for Detection of Klebsiella pneumonlae carbapenemase genes显示文摘 | Justin MC Audrey NS Charles EH | 2009 | J Clini Microbiol2009，47，2： | 1 |
| 6 | Daclatasvir vs telaprevir plus peginterferon alfa/ribavirin for hepatitis C virus genotype 1显示文摘AIM: To evaluate daclatasvir vs telaprevir, each combined with peginterferon alfa-2a/ribavirin(peg IFN/RBV), in treatment-naive hepatitis C virus(HCV) genotype(GT) 1-infected patients.METHODS: In this phase 3, randomized, open-label, noninferiority study, 602 patients were randomly assigned(2:1) to daclatasvir vs telaprevir, stratified by IL28 B rs12979860 host genotype(CC vs non-CC), cirrhosis status(compensated cirrhosis vs no cirrhosis), and HCV GT1 subtype(GT1a vs GT1b). Patients were selected by study inclusion criteria from a total of 793 enrolled patients. Patients received daclatasvir 60 mg once daily or telaprevir 750 mg 3 times daily plus peg IFN/RBV. Daclatasvir recipients received 24 wk of daclatasvir plus peg IFN/RBV; those without an extended rapid virologic response(e RVR; undetectable HCV-RNA at weeks 4 and 12) received an additional 24 wk of peg IFN/RBV. Telaprevir-treated patients received 12 wk of telaprevir plus peg IFN/RBV followed by 12(with e RVR) or 36(no e RVR) wk of peg IFN/RBV. The primary objective was to compare for noninferiority of sustained virologic response rates at posttreatment week 12(SVR12) in GT1b-infected patients. Key secondary objectives were to demonstrate that the rates of anemia(hemoglobin < 10 g/d L) and rashrelated events, through week 12, were lower with daclatasvir + peg IFN/RBV than with telaprevir + peg IFN/RBV among GT1b-infected patients. Resistance testing was performed using population-based sequencing of the NS5 A region for all patients at baseline, and for patients with virologic failure or relapse and HCV-RNA ≥ 1000 IU/m L, to investigate any link between NS5 A polymorphisms associated with daclatasvir resistance and virologic outcome. RESULTS: Patient demographics and disease characteristics were generally balanced across treatment arms; however, there was a higher proportion of black/African Americans in the daclatasvir groups(6.0% and 8.2% in the GT1 b and GT1 a groups, respectively) than in the telaprevir groups(2.2% and 3.0%). Among GT1 binfected patients, daclatasvir plus peg IFN/RBV was noninferior to telaprevir plus peg IFN/RBV for SVR12 [85%(228/268) vs 81%(109/134); difference, 4.3%(95%CI:-3.3% to 11.9%)]. Anemia(hemoglobin < 10 g/d L) was significantly less frequent with daclatasvir than with telaprevir [difference,-29.1%(95%CI:-38.8% to-19.4%)]. Rash-related events were also less common with daclatasvir than with telaprevir, but the difference was not statistically significant. In GT1 ainfected patients, SVR12 was 64.9% with daclatasvir and 69.7% with telaprevir. Among both daclatasvir and telaprevir treatment groups, across GT1b- or GT1a-infected patients, lower response rates were observed in patients with IL28 B non-CC and cirrhosis- factors known to affect response to peg IFN/RBV. Consistent with these observations, a multivariate logistic regression analysis in GT1b-infected patients d e m o n s t ra t e d t h a t S V R 1 2 wa s a s s o c i a t e d w i t h IL28 B host genotype(CC vs non-CC, P = 0.011) and cirrhosis status(absent vs present, P = 0.031). NS5 A polymorphisms associated with daclatasvir resistance(at L28, R30, L31, or Y93) were observed in 17.3% of GT1b-infected patients at baseline; such variants did not appear to be absolute predictors of failure since 72.1% of these patients achieved SVR12 compared with 86.9% without these polymorphisms. Among GT1b-infected patients, treatment was completed by 85.4%(229/268) in the daclatasvir group, and by 85.1%(114/134) in the telaprevir group, and among GT1a-infected patients, by 67.2%(90/134) and 69.7%(46/66), respectively. Discontinuations(of all 3 agents) due to an AE were more frequent with telaprevir than with daclatasvir, whereas discontinuations due to lack of efficacy were more frequent with daclatasvir, due, in part, to differences in futility criteria. CONCLUSION: Daclatasvir plus peg IFN/RBV demonstrated noninferiority to telaprevir plus peg IFN/RBV for SVR12 and was well-tolerated in treatment-naive GT1 binfected patients, supporting the use of daclatasvir with other direct-acting antivirals. | Ira Jacobson Stefan Zeuzem Robert Flisiak Brygida Knysz Stefan Lueth Dorota Zarebska-Michaluk Ewa Janczewska Peter Ferenci Moises Diago Anna Linda Zignego Rifaat Safadi Yaacov Baruch Dzhamal Abdurakhmanov Stephen Shafran Dominique Thabut Rafael Bruck Adrian Gadano Alexander James Thompson Justin Kopit Fiona Mc Phee Tracy Michener Eric A Hughes Philip D Yin Stephanie Noviello | 2016 | World Journal of Gastroenterology2016，22，12： | 1 |
您所在的机构暂未开通此部分的功能，请联系管理员