维普中文期刊产品整合服务
32篇 您的检索式:作者名="Mohit Bhandari"
    题名 作者 年代 出处 被引量
1Intra-abdominal pressure:Time ripe to revise managementguidelines of acute pancreatitis?显示文摘AIM: To systematically review evidence on pathophysiology of intra-abdominal pressure(IAP) in acute pancreatitis(AP) with its clinical correlates. METHODS: Systematic review of available evidence in English literature with relevant medical subject heading terms on Pub Med, Medline and Scopus with further search from open access sources on internet as suggested by articles retrieved. RESULTS: Intra-abdominal hypertension(IAH) is increasingly gaining recognition as a point of specific intervention with potential to alter disease outcome and improve mortality in AP. IAH can be expected in at least 17% of patients presenting with diagnosis of AP to a typical tertiary care hospital(prevalence increasing to 50% in those with severe disease). Abdominal compartment syndrome can be expected in at least 15% patients with severe disease. Recent guidelines on management of AP do not acknowledge utility of surveillance for IAP other than those by Japanese Society of Hepato-BiliaryPancreatic Surgery. We further outline pathophysiologic mechanisms of IAH; understanding of which advances our knowledge and helps to coherently align common observed variations in management related conundrums(such as fluid therapy, nutrition and antibiotic prophylaxis) with potential to further individualize treatment in AP. CONCLUSION: We suggest that IAP be given its due place in future practice guidelines and that recommendations be formed with help of a broader panel with inclusion of clinicians experienced in management of IAH.jiten jaipuria vimal bhandari avneet singh chawla mohit singh 2016World Journal of Gastrointestinal Pathophysiology2016,7,1:14
2移位跟骨骨折——不良结果的预后因素显示文摘关于移位跟骨骨折的治疗方法的争论使许多文献问世,在争论中,少数的研究报告了患者及创伤的类型与治疗结果间的关系。那些报告中的与治疗结果不良的有关因素包括工伤赔偿情况、Bhler角小于0°的骨折、男性患者、重体力劳动职业、双侧跟骨骨折及SandersⅣ型骨折。Beate P.Hanson Mohit Bhandari 陈滨 姜小惟 2005中华创伤骨科杂志2005,7,11:12
3如何设计高质量针刺临床研究:基于证据的专家共识显示文摘本针刺随机对照试验(Randomised controlled trials, RCT)专家共识是基于目前针刺试验面临的最普遍、最关键问题,由临床医生、研究人员、从事针灸和外科的临床试验专家、统计专家、临床流行病学和方法学专家以及患者组成的国际临床研究小组联合制订。该共识将有助于临床试验资助者、注册者以及期刊编辑等评估针刺RCT方案及研究结果的相关性、重要性和质量。张誉清 焦睿珉 Claudia M Witt 劳力行 刘建平 Lehana Thabane Karen J Sherman Mike Cummings Dawn P Richards Eun-Kyung Anna Kim Tae-Hun Kim Myeong Soo Lee Michael E Wechsler Benno Brinkhaus Jun J Mao Caroline A Smith 岗卫娟 刘保延 刘志顺 刘岩 郑晖 吴佳霓 AloBSO Carrasco-Labra Mohit Bhandari Philip J Devereaux 景向红 Gordon Guyatt 2022英国医学杂志中文版2022,25,6:7
4髋部骨折——经皮加压钢板固定与髋螺钉固定的探讨显示文摘研究表明,经皮加压钢板固定(PCCP)和髋螺钉固定(HS)在治疗髋部骨折相比较的结果各式各样。研究结果推荐PCCP,因为它需求的平均输血量较低,术后疼痛较轻。PCCP和HS两种治疗方法的置入失败率都很低。然而,置入失败和二次手术在PCCP组可能更为常见。额外的随机对照实验可以被用来检验这些结果。Beate P.Hanson Mohit Bhandari 陈滨(译校) 姜小惟(译校) 2005中华创伤骨科杂志2005,7,10:6
5Operative vs non-operative management of displaced proximal humeral fractures in the elderly: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials显示文摘AIM: To perform a systematic review and meta-analysis comparing operative vs non-operative treatment of displaced proximal humerus fractures in elderly patients.METHODS: A systematic literature search was performed using EMBASE and MEDLINE through the OVID interface,CINAHL,the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials(CENTRAL),Proquest,Web of Science,SAE digital library,and Transportation Research Board's TRID database.Searches of conference proceedings were also conducted.All available randomized controlled trials comparing operative vs non-operative management of displaced three- and four-part proximal humerus fractures in elderly patients were included.The primary outcomes measures included physical function,pain,health related quality of life,mortality,and the re-operation rate.RESULTS: Six randomized controlled trials(n = 287) were included.There was no statistically significant difference in function(MD = 1.72,95%CI:-2.90-6.34,P = 0.47),as measured by the Constant score,between the operative and the non-operative treatment groups.There was no statistically significance difference insecondary outcomes of health related quality of life(standardized MD = 0.27,95%CI:-0.05-0.59,P = 0.09),and mortality(relative risk 1.29,95%CI: 0.50-3.35,P = 0.60).Operative treatment had a statistically significant higher re-operation rate(relative risk 4.09,95%CI: 1.50-11.15,P = 0.006),and statistically significant decreased pain(MD = 1.26,95%CI: 0.02-2.49,P = 0.05).CONCLUSION: There is moderate quality evidence to suggest that there is no difference in functional outcomes between the two treatments.Further high quality randomized controlled trials are required to determine if certain subgroup populations benefit from surgical management.Santa Rabi Nathan Evaniew Sheila A Sprague Mohit Bhandari Gerard P Slobogean 2015World Journal of Orthopedics2015,6,10:5
6加拿大Ⅰ级创伤中心10年间创伤结构变化分析显示文摘创伤不仅在发达国家,而且在中低收入国家也已成为最主要的公共健康问题之一。WHO的报告显示,在全球15~44岁的人口中十大致死原因中的第五位是创伤;道路交通事故已成为全球与创伤有关死亡的主要原因。了解和认识一定区域内创伤的变化情况和趋势,有助于制订社区疾病预防措施,也是医院制订医疗服务和发展计划的基本依据。笔者旨在探讨1995,2000和2004年加拿大安大略省汉密尔顿地区Ⅰ级创伤中心收治严重创伤患者的相关情况。李建林 Brian Yang Mohit Bhandari Wayne Fung 2007中华创伤杂志2007,23,11:3
7Uneven global distribution of randomized trials in hip fracture surgery显示文摘Marco Yeung Mohit Bhandari 2012Acta Orthopaedica2012,,4:2
8股骨近端骨折——单极与双极人工股骨头置换的比较显示文摘5项随机对照研究的证据显示:单极与双极人工股骨头置换术治疗股骨近端骨折的疗效相当,其中涉及功能恢复、短期或长期死亡率、再脱位风险及感染率等几个方面。其中仅1项研究随访比例大于85%,由于部分随访比例低,所以结论存在偏倚。有必要采用严格方法学,提高随访比例,进一步开展随机对照研究以明确两种方法何者更优、更安全。Mohit Bhandari 王簕(译) 杨云峰(译) 2011中华创伤骨科杂志2011,13,3:2
9开放性骨折——创口I期或延迟闭合时感染及骨不愈合的发生率显示文摘对于开放性骨折I期或延迟闭合创口所伴随的感染或骨不愈合的发生率,三项有关的回顾性群组研究得出的结果并不一致。一项有关胫骨开放性骨折的研究表明,Ⅱ期延迟闭合创口与I期闭合相比较,其骨不愈合及感染的发生率均显著降低;但此结果与另外两项研究结果迥异。而且由于各项研究中的骨折类型和固定方法均不尽相同,要对三项研究做一综合性比较亦非常困难。Mohit Bhandari Joseph R Dettori 李旭(译) 2007中华创伤骨科杂志2007,9,8:2
10Evidence-based medicine: What it is and what it is not显示文摘Mohit Bhandari Peter V. Giannoudis 2006Injury2006,,4:1
11The Pilon Map: Fracture Lines and Comminution Zones in OTA/AO Type 43C3 Pilon Fractures显示文摘Peter A. Cole Robert K. Mehrle Mohit Bhandari Michael Zlowodzki 2013Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma2013,,7:1
12Effect of early surgery after hip fracture on mortality and complications: systematic review and meta-analysis显示文摘Simunovic Nicole Devereaux P J Sprague Sheila Guyatt Gordon H Schemitsch Emil DeBeer Justin Bhandari Mohit 2010Canadian Medical Association. Journal2010,,15:1
13Current management of tibial shaft fractures: A survey of 450 Canadian orthopedic trauma surgeons显示文摘Jason W Busse Emily Morton Christina Lacchetti Gordon H Guyatt Mohit Bhandari 2008Acta Orthopaedica2008,,5:1
14Optimal Internal Fixation for Femoral Neck Fractures: Multiple Screws or Sliding Hip Screws?显示文摘Mohit Bhandari Paul Tornetta Beate Hanson Marc F Swiontkowski 2009Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma2009,,6:1
15Impact of the Surgical Research Methodology Program on Surgical Residents’ Research Profiles显示文摘Forough Farrokhyar Nalin Amin Deepak Dath Mohit Bhandari Stephan Kelly Ann M. Kolkin Catherine Gill-Pottruff Martina Skot Susan Reid 2014Journal of Surgical Education2014,,:1
16桡骨远端骨折外固定与石膏制动保守治疗比较显示文摘三项随机或半随机对照研究中的证据表明,在以女性为主的老年桡骨远端骨折患者中,无论是用外固定(EF)或石膏制动治疗,医疗评价或患者自我评价的结果并无差异。另一项研究结果显示,在以男性为主的年轻患者中,使用EF者的医疗评价要优于使用石膏者。Mohit Bhandari Beate P Hanson 李旭(译校) 2008中华创伤骨科杂志2008,10,3:1
17Evidence-based medicine: What it is and what it is not显示文摘Mohit Bhandari Peter V. Giannoudis 2006Injury2006,,4:1
18Assessment of Radiographic Fracture Healing in Patients With Operatively Treated Femoral Neck Fractures显示文摘Mohit Bhandari Mary Chiavaras Olufemi Ayeni Rajesh Chakraverrty Naveen Parasu Hema Choudur Simrit Bains Sheila Sprague Brad Petrisor 2013Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma2013,,9:1
19Gamma Nails Revisited: Gamma Nails Versus Compression Hip Screws in the Management of Intertrochanteric Fractures of the Hip: A Meta-Analysis显示文摘Mohit Bhandari Emil Schemitsch Anders J?nsson Michael Zlowodzki George J Haidukewych 2009Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma2009,,6:1
20舟状骨骨折 背侧与掌侧入路螺钉固定的比较显示文摘根据3项小样本回顾性队列研究(共计87例患者)所获得的证据,在舟状骨骨折治疗时,目前仍不能确定背侧入路与掌侧人路螺钉固定何者更优。虽然骨折愈合率、功能状况、疼痛、并发症的发生率在两种方法问相似,但是各研究所得的统计学差异并不一致,这可能是由于研究的样本量较小或者研究中存在偏倚导致的。Mohit Bhandari 杨云峰 2010中华创伤骨科杂志2010,12,10:1
返回顶部 每页显示:
共2页 首页 上一页 第1页 下一页 末页 /2 跳转

网站首页 | 关于我们 | 联系我们 | 产品服务 | 客服中心 | 广告服务 | 版权声明 | 网站联盟 | 友情链接 | 售卡网点

版权所有© 渝B2-20050021-1 渝公网安备 50019002500403号 违法和不良信息举报中心

互联网出版许可证 新出网证(渝)字10号 全国400电话 - 免长途话费