维普中文期刊产品整合服务
7篇 您的检索式:作者名="Stephen Thorpe"
    题名 作者 年代 出处 被引量
1Determination of the pesticide ditlubenzuron in mushrooms by HPLC-atmospheric pressure chemical ionisation mass spectrometry显示文摘Karen A Barnes James R Startin Stephen A Thorpe 1995Journal of Chromatography A1995,712,1:1
2Crisis discourse in physical educationand the laugh of Michel Foucault 显示文摘STEPHEN THORPE 2003Sport Edu Soc2003,8,2:1
3Determination of the pesticide diflubenzuron in mushrooms by high- performance liquidchromatography-atmospheric pressure chemical ionization mass spectrometry显示文摘Barnes Karen A Stattin James R Thorpe Stephen A 1995Journal of Chromatography A1995,712,:1
4Web-Based Course Evaluation: Comparing The Experience At Two Univisities显示文摘Jack McGourty Kevin Scoles Stephen Thorpe 2002Journal of the FIE(Session T1B)2002,,69:1
5Project-specific web sites:friend or foe显示文摘Thorpe T Stephen M 2000Journal of Construction Engineering and Management2000,127,5:1
6Determination of the pesticide diflubenzuron in mushrooms by high-performance liquid chromatography-atmospheric pressure chemical ionisation mass spectrometry显示文摘Karen A Barnes James R Startin Stephen A Thorpe 1995Journal of Chromatography A1995,712,:1
7Cash transfer during the COVID-19 pandemic:a multicentre,randomised controlled trial显示文摘Objective To evaluate the effect of a one-time cash transfer of$C1000 in people who are unable to physically distance due to insufficient income.Design Open-label,multi-centre,randomised superiority trial.Setting Seven primary care sites in Ontario,Canada;six urban sites associated with St.Michael’s Hospital in Toronto and one in Manitoulin Island.Participants 392 individuals who reported trouble affording basic necessities due to disruptions related to COVID-19.Intervention After random allocation,participants either received the cash transfer of$C1000(n=196)or physical distancing guidelines alone(n=196).Main outcome measures The primary outcome was the maximum number of symptoms consistent with COVID-19 over 14 days.Secondary outcomes were meeting clinical criteria for COVID-19,SARS-CoV-2 presence,number of close contacts,general health and ability to afford basic necessities.Results The primary outcome of number of symptoms reported by participants did not differ between groups after 2 weeks(cash transfer,mean 1.6 vs 1.9,ratio of means 0.83;95%CI 0.56 to 1.24).There were no statistically significant effects on secondary outcomes of the meeting COVID-19 clinical criteria(7.9%vs 12.8%;risk difference−0.05;95%CI−0.11 to 0.01),SARS-CoV-2 presence(0.5%vs 0.6%;risk difference 0.0095%CI−0.02 to 0.02),mean number of close contacts(3.5 vs 3.7;rate ratio 1.10;95%CI 0.83 to 1.46),general health very good or excellent(60%vs 63%;risk difference−0.0395%CI−0.14 to 0.08)and ability to make ends meet(52%vs 51%;risk difference 0.0195%CI−0.10 to 0.12).Conclusions A single cash transfer did not reduce the COVID-19 symptoms or improve the ability to afford necessities.Further studies are needed to determine whether some groups may benefit from financial supports and to determine if a higher level of support is beneficial.Trial registration number NCT04359264.Navindra Persaud Kevin E Thorpe Michael Bedard Stephen W Hwang Andrew Pinto Peter Jüni Bruno R da Costa 2021Family Medicine and Community Health2021,9,4:0
返回顶部 每页显示:
共1页 首页 上一页 第1页 下一页 末页 /1 跳转

网站首页 | 关于我们 | 联系我们 | 产品服务 | 客服中心 | 广告服务 | 版权声明 | 网站联盟 | 友情链接 | 售卡网点

版权所有© 渝B2-20050021-1 渝公网安备 50019002500403号 违法和不良信息举报中心

互联网出版许可证 新出网证(渝)字10号 全国400电话 - 免长途话费