维普中文期刊产品整合服务
8篇 您的检索式:作者名="Torabi P"
    题名 作者 年代 出处 被引量
1CT of nonneoplastic hepatic vascular and perfusion disorders显示文摘Torabi M Hosseinzadeh K Federie M P 2008Radiograph- ics2008,28,7:1
2Cen- tral memory self/tumor-reactive CD8 + T cells confer su- perior antitumor immunity compared with eVector memory T ceils显示文摘Klebanoff C A Gattinoni L Torabi Parizi P 2005Proc Natl Acad Sci USA2005,102,27:1
3Experimental and theoretical assessment of brittle fracture in engineering components containing a sharp V-notch显示文摘Ayatollahi M R Torabi A R Azizi P 2011ExpMech2011,51,:1
4Pharmacokinetics of liposomal amphotericin B in pleural fluid显示文摘Moriyama B Torabi P Pratt AK 2010Antimicrob Agents Chemother2010,54,4:1
5Paroxetine vs pregabalin for the management of neuropathic pain in multiple sclerosis显示文摘AIM: To compare the effectiveness and tolerability of paroxetine vs pregabalin for the management of multiple sclerosis(MS)-induced neuropathic pain(NPP).METHODS: A randomized, flexible-dose open-label 8-wk study involving 21 relapsing-remitting MS patients with MS-induced NPP was conducted to evaluate the effectiveness and tolerability of pregabalin versus paroxetine for pain management. The trial included a 3-wk dose titration phase followed by a 5-wk stable dose phase. Primary outcome measures included daily patient-reported pain intensity as measured using a 100 mm visual analogue scale(VAS pain) and daily impact of pain on daily activities(VAS impact). Hierarchical regression modeling was conducted on each outcome to determine if within person VAS trajectory for pain and impact differed across study groups, during 56 d follow-up. RESULTS: Attrition rates were significantly greater(P < 0.001) in the paroxetine versus pregabalin study group(70% vs 18.2%, respectively). Average study duration between study groups also significantly differed(P < 0.001). Paroxetine participants completed an average of 27.3 d of treatment vs 49.5 d in the pregabalin group, with the majority of patients withdrawing due to adverse events. Due to the high attrition rates in the paroxetine study arm, the investigators stopped the study prior to achieving complete recruitment. As such, no significant differences between pregabalin and paroxetine study arms were noted for the primary outcome measures(VAS pain, VAS impact). Comparative assessment of baseline patient characteristics also revealed no significant differences between the study arms. CONCLUSION: High attrition rates associated with paroxetine use suggest that it be used with caution for MS-induced NPP. Efficacy outcomes could not be assessed due to attrition.Dana A Turcotte Malcolm Doupe Mahmoud Torabi Andrew J Gomori Karen Ethans Farid Esfahani Katie Galloway Michael P Namaka 2014World Journal of Anesthesiology2014,3,2:1
6In vitro selection of a sodium-specific DNAzyme and its application in intracellular sensing显示文摘Torabi SF Wu P Mcghee CE 2015Proc Natl Acad Sci USA2015,112,19:1
7Retinoicacid controls the homeostasis of pre-cDC-derived splenic and intestinal dendritic cells 显示文摘Klebanoff CA Spencer SP Torabi Parizi P 2013J Exp Med2013,210,10:1
8Central memory self/tumor-reactive CD8 + T cells confer superior antitumor immunity compared with effector memory T cells 显示文摘Klebanoff CA Gattinoni L Torabi - Parizi P 2005Proc Nat! Acad Sci USA2005,102,27:1
返回顶部 每页显示:
共1页 首页 上一页 第1页 下一页 末页 /1 跳转

网站首页 | 关于我们 | 联系我们 | 产品服务 | 客服中心 | 广告服务 | 版权声明 | 网站联盟 | 友情链接 | 售卡网点

版权所有© 渝B2-20050021-1 渝公网安备 50019002500403号 违法和不良信息举报中心

互联网出版许可证 新出网证(渝)字10号 全国400电话 - 免长途话费